Search for: "Ruth v. State" Results 41 - 60 of 2,786
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jul 2023, 9:04 pm by Series of Essays
Supreme Court holds that states lack standing to challenge immigration prioritization guidelines. _____________________________________________________________________ With Its Student Loan Decision, the Court Again Limits Agency Authority July 20, 2023 | Kate Shaw, Cardozo Law School, and Crawford Schneider, University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School In Biden v. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 1:03 pm by Ryan Goodman
United States Secret Service, USSS Timeline of Jan. 6, 2021 (FOIA release on Jun. 29, 2021) 9. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 11:28 am by Tom Smith
Use “winks and nods,” as the late Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg put it. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 9:31 am by Amy Howe
The majority effectively, though not explicitly, overruled its 2003 decision in Grutter v. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 12:28 pm by Josh Blackman
The post Justice Stevens's Papers Reveal How The Fortune Cookies Were Baked In <I>Lawrence v. [read post]
30 May 2023, 5:13 am by Rick Garnett
It animated his final Religion Clauses opinion, a 2022 dissent in Carson v. [read post]
29 May 2023, 12:00 pm by David Oscar Markus
United States, where Justice Jackson was the only member of the Court to join Justice Gorsuch’s majority opinion in full; and Andy Warhol Foundation for Visual Arts, Inc. v. [read post]
26 May 2023, 1:21 pm by Joel R. Brandes
’s mother, Respondent-Appellant Ruth Sarai Erazo, wrongfully removed M.S.O. from Mexico and crossed with him unlawfully into the United States. [read post]
14 May 2023, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
  Two major projects of legal feminism in the United States—women’s suffrage as achieved by the Nineteenth Amendment—and equal protection of the laws without sex discrimination as achieved by Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s 1970s litigation strategy—tried to end legal patriarchy. [read post]
5 May 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Harris v McRae held that a ‘negative’ right to abortion required no positive state funding, upholding the Hyde Amendment that excluded funding coverage for medically necessary abortions from an otherwise comprehensive Medicaid program. [read post]