Search for: "Rutledge v. State" Results 61 - 80 of 270
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
March 13 – Declaration of National Emergency The President declared a national state of emergency under the Stafford Act for all U.S. states, territories and possessions. [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 12:24 am by Chukwuma Okoli
[28] Secondly, it must be stated that Nigerian courts are able to decline jurisdiction, when called upon to hear a case, if upon considering all relevant factors, they form the view that another forum exists with jurisdiction and is the more appropriate forum.[29] However, when a judgment is brought for recognition in Nigeria, Nigerian court [read post]
14 Dec 2020, 6:58 am by skelly
On December 10th, the Supreme Court of the United States issued its ruling in Rutledge v. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 7:05 am by Howard Bashman
Alito, Jr. delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court, Justice Barrett not participating, in United States v. [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 12:27 pm by Ronald Mann
Bronni, solicitor general of Arkansas, argues remotely for petitioner (Art Lien) The justices heard argument on Tuesday in Rutledge v. [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 8:32 am by James Romoser
On the second day of the Supreme Court’s new term, the justices heard arguments in Rutledge v. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 7:24 am by Ronald Mann
The case, Rutledge v Pharmaceutical Care Management Association, presents a challenge to the validity of state laws that regulate the reimbursements that pharmacies receive when they sell prescription drugs. [read post]
10 Sep 2020, 6:59 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
Rutledge v Canaan In Rutledge v Canaan Construction Inc, 2020 ONSC 4246 (“Rutledge”), Ontario’s Divisional Court decided that an employee had been wrongfully dismissed after his employer laid him off and failed to provide him with his notice entitlements under the Employment Standards Act, 2000 (“ESA”). [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 3:57 pm by Eugene Volokh
The opinion largely follows the logic of the Fifth Circuit opinion (In re Abbott) that reached the same result, and particularly sharply condemns the trial court for ignoring Jacobson v. [read post]