Search for: "S & E Contractors, Inc. v. United States" Results 41 - 60 of 307
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Feb 2018, 4:30 am by Robert Loeb, Sarah Grant
 The majority opinion, after 14 pages of opining how the ATS does not apply to human rights violations occurring outside the United States, added: “[o]n these facts, all the relevant conduct took place outside the United States. [read post]
13 Nov 2014, 8:43 am by AmandaWilwert
The Court’s decision in Global Military Marketing, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Nov 2015, 6:41 am
If his company won the bid for the subcontract, Nagle and Fink's businesses would perform all of the work.Fink pled guilty to one count of conspiracy to defraud the United States. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 10:37 am by Emily Theriault
  The United States declined to intervene in the case and many of the relator’s claims were dismissed due to the public disclosure bar or the first-to-file rule. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 1:45 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Out-of-state employers, insurers, employee benefit plan vendors, and other businesses registered to do business in Pennsylvania, Georgia, Iowa, Kansas, Minnesota, or another state that requires that out-of-state businesses consent to jurisdiction as a condition of their registration to do business in the state face a heightened risk of getting hauled into court in the consent to jurisdiction state following last month’s Supreme Court… [read post]