Search for: "S & E Contractors, Inc. v. United States" Results 61 - 80 of 307
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jul 2015, 5:04 am by Jon Gelman
 Misclassification of employees as independent contractors is found in an increasing number of workplaces in the United States, in part reflecting larger restructuring of business organizations. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 10:59 am by Keith Szeliga
Cost Principles Coverage of Direct and Indirect Costs A “direct cost” is any cost that is identified specifically with a particular final cost objective.[1] A “cost objective” is a function, organizational subdivision, contract, or other work unit for which the contractor accumulates and measures costs.[2] A “final cost objective” is a cost objective that receives an allocation of both direct and indirect costs and that is one of the final… [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 5:00 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Employer and union sponsored group health plans covered by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) and their insurers are not required to comply with a Vermont state law that requires health insurers and certain other parties to report payments relating to health care claims and other information relating to health care services to a state agency for compilation in an all-inclusive health care database, according to the United States Supreme… [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 8:59 am by Derek J. Lindenschmidt
App. 2009) (holding that a claim for damages arising from poor workmanship, standing alone, does not allege an accident that constitutes a covered occurrence), as well as the United States District Court for the District of Colorado’s ruling in Greystone Constr., Inc. v. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 4:14 am by Nathaniel Sobel
Rubio, it would “empower state and local governments in the United States to counter the anti-Israel boycott, divestment and sanctions movement’s discriminatory economic warfare against the Jewish state. [read post]
18 Feb 2012, 5:15 am by Richard Renner
Boston Scientific Corp., 433 F.3d 1, 5 (1st Cir. 2006)(holding that SOX has no application to employees outside the United States). [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 1:01 pm
Hibner, Jr.213.617.4115dhibner@sheppardmullin.com[1] See, Foremost Pro Color, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 11:40 am by Aurora Barnes
United States 17-5165 Issue: Whether Richardson v. [read post]
17 Jan 2016, 9:07 am by Eric Goldman
The states would join North Carolina, Arkansas, and Indiana in requiring the contractor designation as part of new laws governing so-called transportation network companies, a Reuters review of state legislation showed. [read post]
22 Jul 2009, 2:19 pm
  Elsewhere in Washington, D.C., the United States Senate has also weighed in in favor of E-Verify. [read post]
10 Jun 2021, 8:42 am by Rohini Kurup
On April 27, the Supreme Court agreed to take up United States v. [read post]