Search for: "S & E Contractors, Inc. v. United States" Results 81 - 100 of 306
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jun 2019, 1:54 pm by Unknown
By Jean MeyerOn May 30, 2019, Judge Richard Brooke Jackson of the United States District Court for the District of Colorado offered an insightful lesson to the parties in Auto-Owners Insurance Co. v. [read post]
18 May 2019, 9:27 am by MOTP
Rather, he stated that the factors relevant to his attorney's fees were (1) the amount in controversy, (2) the complexity of the case, and (3) his knowledge and experience—three of the eight factors set out in Arthur Andersen & Co. v. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 4:14 am by Nathaniel Sobel
Rubio, it would “empower state and local governments in the United States to counter the anti-Israel boycott, divestment and sanctions movement’s discriminatory economic warfare against the Jewish state. [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 8:12 am
Ct., NY Co., 6/20/18)Condo unit loss.Summary judgment to property's insurer.This was an action to collect on a default judgment Philadelphia, a condominium complex's insurer, had obtained against the owner of a vacant condo unit in which pipes froze and burst, causing water damage to the complex. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 7:58 pm by MOTP
Any arbitration shall be conducted in Harris County, Texas, United States of America in the English language. [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 3:55 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Anthem’s Record Setting HIPAA Breach & Resolution Agreement The settlement agreement announced October 15, 2018 by OCR requires Anthem, Inc. to pay a $16 million resolution payment to OCR and take a series of corrective actions to resolve HIPAA liabilities to OCR for allowing the largest known U.S. health data breach in history in 2015. [read post]
The cases, listed newest to oldest, and the Court’s summaries are as follows: Union of Medical Marijuana Patients, Inc. v. [read post]
The cases, listed newest to oldest, and the Court’s summaries are as follows: Union of Medical Marijuana Patients, Inc. v. [read post]