Search for: "S G v. J G" Results 1 - 20 of 3,771
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Mar 2009, 2:24 am
R v G; R v J [2009] UKHL 13; [2009] WLR (D) 80 “To rely on the defence in s 58(3) of the Terrorism Act 2000 a defendant had to show an objectively ‘reasonable excuse’ for his action or possession and a ruling that neither a desire to ‘wind up’ prison officers nor mental illness could [...] [read post]
26 Apr 2016, 5:30 am by John Lewis
The appellate court held that J & Gs waiver of the right to arbitrate Collado’s FLSA claim did “not extend to the state law claims that were pleaded for the first time after J & G had litigated to the point of waiver of the FLSA claims. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 8:49 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
"We will remand the record to the Immigration Judge to determine if the respondent is credible, consistent with the First Circuit’s remand order [ Reyes v. [read post]
25 Mar 2012, 7:18 pm by Shawn Wright
Wilton athttp://www.losangelesbankruptcylawmonitor.com/2012/04/articles/chapter-13/g-is-for-gomes-v-countrywide-home-loans-inc/   Garnishment at Birmingham Bankruptcy Attorney Christine A. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 12:02 pm by Patricia Hughes
Now we have Ontario (Attorney General) v. [read post]
19 Mar 2021, 3:37 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
At first instance, Lieven J held that the father’s application for a return order should be stayed pending the determination of Gs mother’s asylum claim. [read post]
10 Sep 2023, 12:06 pm by Rose Hughes
PatKat will be joining Ian Jones (GJE), James St.Ville KC (8 New Square) and Sarah J. [read post]
18 May 2016, 6:20 am by scanner1
FRIEDMAN and HIGH MOUNTAIN SPIRIT QUEST, INC., Plaintiffs and Appellees, v, AARON G. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 3:44 am by Rose Hughes
PatKat will be joining Ian Jones (GJE), James St.Ville KC (8 New Square), Sarah J. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 4:20 pm by INFORRM
The current President of the Employment Appeal Tribunal, Underhill J, in a judgment which contains a comprehensive review of the law on the use of Restricted Reporting Orders and Anonymity Orders in the Employment Tribunal (F v G (Practice and Procedure: Reporting Restriction order) UKEAT/0042/11/DA), has anticipated the arrival of the Extended Restricted Reporting Order. [read post]
9 Jan 2016, 9:42 pm by Patricia Salkin
Additionally, J&G did not create a “de facto and/or implied attorney-client relationship” with the Defendants because did not have a reasonable basis to believe that any confidential information they disclosed to J&G would have been kept secret from their co-petitioner and J&Gs long-term client, BT Holdings. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 10:37 am
Supreme Court seemingly forever yesterday to post its opinions to that Court's own web site, few may have noticed that this page on the Court's web site attributes the decision in Logan v. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 2:30 am
R v G (Respondent) (on appeal from the Court of Appeal Criminal Division) R v J (Respondent) (on appeal from the Court of Appeal Criminal Division) R (on the application of Ahmad) (Respondent) v Mayor and Burgesses of London Borough of Newham (Appellants) Source: www.parliament.uk [read post]