Search for: "S v. Dallas Independent School District" Results 1 - 20 of 84
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Aug 2013, 11:26 am by admin
Dallas Independent School District, 3:11-cv-00393-D (2013), the court granted summary judgment to the Dallas Independent School District (“DISD”) and dismissed Bennett’s claims under the ADA and Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (“USERRA”) when Bennett refused to take a psychological exam following a disability related reassignment, and then [...]The post Disabled… [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 1:14 pm by admin
Dallas Independent School District where the Complainant, unbeknownst to the ALJ, responded to requests for admission but did not file that response with the ALJ. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 6:59 am by Mark S. Humphreys
The United States District Court, Northern District, Dallas Division, recently had to decide whether a commercial policy purchased by contractors of the Quinlan Independent School District (QUID) were liable in a claim made by the QISD against one of its contractors. [read post]
24 Dec 2014, 4:37 am
  The next day, Principal Wiygul and the school districts attorney, Michele Floyd, askedBell about the song and its accusations. . . . [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 8:03 pm
There is a pending Texas Supreme Court mandamus proceeding about bonds to pay for schools: In re Waller Independent School District No.08-0079. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 11:47 am by DMLP Staff
Attorney)Source of Law: United StatesVerdict or Settlement Amount: N/ALegal Claims: Computer Fraud and Abuse ActFraudTheftOtherCourt Name: United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas: Dallas DivisionLegal Counsel: Douglas A Morris (Federal Public Defender - Dallas); Ahmed Ghappour (University of Texas Law School), Charles D. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 11:47 am by DMLP Staff
Swift (Swift & McDonald, PC), Marlo P Cadeddu (Law Office of Marlo P Cadeddu)Court Name: United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas: Dallas DivisionCourt Type: Federal The U.S. government filed three indictments, consisting of seventeen charges, against Barrett Brown, an independent journalist. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 11:47 am by DMLP Staff
Swift (Swift & McDonald, PC), Marlo P Cadeddu (Law Office of Marlo P Cadeddu)Court Name: United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas: Dallas DivisionCourt Type: Federal The U.S. government filed three indictments, consisting of seventeen charges, against Barrett Brown, an independent journalist. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 12:04 pm by Greene LLP
Lehmann was initiated by two whistleblowers that had previously bid for contracts with HISD and the Dallas Independent School District (“DISD”). [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 9:20 am by Steven Cohen
  The court also states that Miller is a retired chief of police for the Dallas Independent School District and has a thirty year career in law enforcement. [read post]
15 Aug 2008, 9:08 am
DALLAS INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT; from Dallas County; 5th district (05-07-00288-CV, 251 SW3d 152, 03-25-08, pet. denied Aug 2008) (Justice Hecht not sitting) (property tax, denial of partial property tax exemption) 08-0483 MICHAEL MCLANE v. [read post]
3 May 2018, 6:17 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Dallas Independent School District that Section 1981 claims cannot be brought against governmental defendants. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 2:39 am
§1981.Citing Monell v New York Department of Social Services, 436 U.S. 658, the Circuit Court commented that the Supreme Court had ruled that a municipality may not be held vicariously liable for the federal constitutional or statutory violations of its employees.Although Monell concerned lawsuit brought pursuant to 42 USC §1983, the Third Circuit said that the Supreme Court had extended its holding in Monell to §1981 actions in its ruling in Jett v Dallas… [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 4:00 am
§1981.Citing Monell v New York Department of Social Services, 436 U.S. 658, the Circuit Court commented that the Supreme Court had ruled that a municipality may not be held vicariously liable for the federal constitutional or statutory violations of its employees.Although Monell concerned lawsuit brought pursuant to 42 USC §1983, the Third Circuit said that the Supreme Court had extended its holding in Monell to §1981 actions in its ruling in Jett… [read post]