Search for: "S. C. Sup. Court"
Results 81 - 100
of 1,054
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jul 2022, 8:56 pm
Chartier, No. 19-1681 (Iowa Sup. [read post]
5 Jul 2015, 4:01 am
Intitulé: Presse ltée (La) c. [read post]
15 Jul 2008, 9:00 am
(Sup. [read post]
15 Aug 2008, 9:08 am
May 1, 2008)(Opinion on motion for rehearing by Hanks) (child support modification, child support decrease, retroactive effect, intentional underemployment) Opinion affirming trial court's judgment by Justice George C. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 9:48 pm
(Sup. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 9:59 am
Sup. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 5:03 am
(Sup. [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 5:51 am
In granting the plaintiffs' motion with respect to Plainview and Garcia, Nassau County Supreme Court Justice Stephen Bucaria held: Under the Court of Appeals' holding in State Farm v Mallella, supra at 319, where as here, a professional service corporation such as Plainview was established under the facially valid cover of a nominal physician owner i.e., defendant Rafael Garcia, but was, in fact, actually operated by a non-physician in violation of Business Corporation… [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 5:43 am
Here is the full opinion: The following constitutes the court’s decision and order concerning the closure of the Nassau County Surrogate’s Court from public access during the A and C adoption related proceeding. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 6:46 am
CGC-17-561299 (Cal Sup. [read post]
11 Aug 2019, 4:00 am
Ville de Hudson, 2019 QCCS 2627Juridiction : Cour supérieure (C.S.), Beauharnois (Salaberry-de-Valleyfield), 760-17-004140-151Décision de : Juge Pierre-C. [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 5:59 pm
(Sup. [read post]
29 Jan 2017, 4:00 am
— «cour supérieure» au sens de R. c. [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 6:59 am
Pals, 2011 Iowa Sup. [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 6:38 pm
Sup. [read post]
19 Nov 2022, 7:04 am
Sup. [read post]
4 Jun 2017, 4:00 am
PROFESSIONS : La bâtonnière du Barreau du Québec échoue en appel du jugement de la Cour supérieure ayant rejeté son recours en nullité d’une décision du Comité d’accès à la profession qui avait déclaré l’intimé admissible à l’inscription au tableau de l’Ordre Intitulé : Synnott c. [read post]
30 Oct 2008, 8:27 am
(Sup. [read post]
7 May 2019, 6:10 am
” The court responds: One obvious problem with Daniel’s argument is that § 230(c)(1) contains no good faith requirement. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 8:56 am
Co., 183 Misc. 678 [Sup Ct, New York County 1944] ). [read post]