Search for: "SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL UTILITY v. US "
Results 1 - 19
of 19
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Sep 2022, 7:37 am
The public power utility and police racially profiled Asian communities in the illegal data-sharing scheme.SACRAMENTO—The Sacramento Municipal Utility District (SMUD) searches entire zip codes’ worth of people’s private data and discloses it to police without a warrant or any suspicion of wrongdoing, according to a privacy lawsuit filed Wednesday in Sacramento County Superior Court. [read post]
27 Sep 2022, 9:00 am
The water utilities allege that during active operations of the Base, the federal government used products containing Cr6, which contaminated the groundwater aquifer from which the water utilities derive municipal drinking water, making it unsafe for human consumption. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 8:25 am
Hagman, trustee, v. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 7:55 am
The plaintiffs in Held v. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 6:25 am
The Supreme Court in McCutcheon v. [read post]
27 Aug 2021, 4:00 am
In Shelby County v. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 8:53 am
County of Sacramento (2009) ___ Cal.App.4th ___. [read post]
Appellate Court Shuts Out Trial Court in CEQA/ESA Double Header under Deferential Standard of Review
3 Apr 2014, 11:08 am
Underlying Land Use Approvals and Subsequent Actions. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 9:34 am
City of San Diego v. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 12:30 pm
One decision, Lotus v. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 3:00 am
Sacramento v. [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 4:23 pm
AbbottThe Delta, the confluence of the Sacramento and San Joaquin rivers, is ground zero in the debate over California water. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 10:03 am
That alternative is backed by a diverse group that includes The Bay Institute, the Contra Costa Council, Defenders of Wildlife, Environmental Entrepreneurs, the Planning and Conservation League, the Natural Resources Defense Council, the San Diego County Water Authority, Alameda County Water District, Contra Costa Water District, East Bay Municipal Utility District, Otay Water District, the City of San Diego and the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 6:44 am
PierceDocket: 09-1353Issue(s): Whether the court of appeals misinterpreted the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act, 42 U.S.C. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 3:00 am
California et al. v. [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 3:00 am
The case and the Court’s summary is as follows: County of Butte v. [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 3:00 am
The case and the Court’s summary is as follows: County of Butte v. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:08 am
The utility will also pay up to $100,000 for consultants – picked jointly by the utility and the activists — to critique the plan and advise the activists about any new problems. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 8:28 am
Introduction Economists tend to love property taxes; the public is likely to view this as more proof, as if it were needed, of John Maynard Keynes’ observation that economics is extremely useful—as a form of employment for economists. [read post]
