Search for: "SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL V US"
Results 1 - 20
of 53
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Sep 2022, 7:37 am
As that data accumulates over time, it can provide inferences about private daily routines such as what devices are being used, when they are in use, and how this changes over time. [read post]
27 Sep 2022, 9:00 am
Water Dist. v. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 11:16 am
A case from 1899 involving the City and County of San Francisco (CCSF), Popper v. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 12:30 pm
Abbott Saltonstall v. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 8:05 am
Solis v. [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 4:20 am
” We rely on our readers to send us links for our round-up. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 7:54 am
Municipal Court of City and County of San Francisco, 387 U.S. 523 (1963). [read post]
6 Mar 2007, 11:57 pm
More recently these laws spread to municipalities throughout the state (see, e.g., Horton v. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 5:39 am
To Sacramento! [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 1:36 pm
Last week, in California Restaurant Association v. [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 2:55 pm
An example of this is local zoning laws that determine whether land can be used for a residence, business, church, or school. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 12:05 am
- Gideon Kanner clues us in to a recent opinion in Florida Dep't of Agriculture & Consumer Services v. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 6:45 am
(County of Sonoma v. [read post]
13 May 2022, 4:00 am
From the States and Municipalities California – CalPERS Board Violated Open Meetings Law, Judge Rules. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 7:55 am
The plaintiffs in Held v. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 8:25 am
Hagman, trustee, v. [read post]
6 Mar 2007, 7:56 am
Connor, 490 U.S. 386, 395 (1989) ("other seizure" to trigger the Fourth Amendment and its "reasonableness" standard) and County of Sacramento v. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 4:00 am
Spending in election cycles by corporations and the ultrawealthy through so-called dark money groups has skyrocketed since the 2010 Supreme Court decision Citizens United v. [read post]
27 Aug 2021, 4:00 am
In Shelby County v. [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 4:00 am
“Not since Bush v. [read post]
