Search for: "SAMUEL SCOTT v. THE STATE OF TEXAS " Results 21 - 40 of 80
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jul 2020, 11:35 am by Adam Feldman
Township of Scott, which overturned the court’s precedent on the issue of eminent domain in the state law context in Williamson County Regional Planning Comm’n v. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
James Room)Panel 3: The Disciplinary State, 2:00-3:30Chair: Erin Braatz, Suffolk University Law School (ebraatz@suffolk.edu)Commentator: Lauren Benton, Vanderbilt University (lauren.benton@vanderbilt.edu)Stacey Hynd, University of Exeter (s.hynd@exeter.ac.uk) (Re-)Constructing Murder: Capital Punishment and the Criminalization of African Bodies in Colonial Ghana, c. 1890-1957Dior Konate, South Carolina State University (dkonate@scsu.edu) Imprisonment and Citizenship in… [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 3:49 pm by Amy Howe
Supreme Court ordered the state supreme court to reconsider that ruling in light of the Supreme Court’s 2016 decision in Foster v. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 5:21 am by Andrew Hamm
” Brett Samuels has the story for The Hill. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 5:25 am by Bobby Chen
Texas, and Masterpiece Cakeshop Ltd. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 12:26 pm by Mark Walsh
The first familiar face we spot in the courtroom today is Scott Keller, the Texas solicitor general, who argued his state’s redistricting case yesterday and is the counsel of record on the amicus brief of Texas and 14 other states (or their governors) in support of President Donald Trump’s proclamation restricting travel to the United States by nationals of certain countries. [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 6:35 am by Dan Carvajal
The Supreme Court’s 1992 Quill Corp. v. [read post]
30 Oct 2017, 5:17 pm by Steve Vladeck
Arguing for the state as the respondent, Texas Solicitor General Scott Keller faced intense questioning from Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Breyer on what the latter referred to as the state’s “unusual jurisdictional argument”—that courts of appeals lack the power to review district court decisions denying funding under Section 3599(f). [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 4:58 pm by Jamie Baker
Velte’s essay Obergefell’s Expressive Promise was cited in the following article: Samuel D. [read post]