Search for: "SAN FRANCISCO POLICE OFFICERS v. City and County of San Francisco" Results 1 - 20 of 165
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 May 2015, 1:58 pm by Ruthann Robson
Professor Ruthann Robson, City University of New York (CUNY) School of Law The United States Supreme Court's opinion in City and County of San Francisco v. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 12:10 pm by admin
City & Cnty. of San Francisco the Ninth Circuit reversed the granting of summary judgment to the San Francisco County on claims of sex discrimination, in its jail staffing policies. [read post]
4 Oct 2018, 8:30 am
Race-based policing is not just a problem in San Francisco — it is nationwide calamity. [read post]
2 Feb 2021, 3:14 pm by Dave Maass
Under San Francisco's surveillance oversight ordinance, the San Francisco Police Department and other City agencies are generally forbidden from using new surveillance technology without Board approval and a public process. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Michael Schaps
Trump) the City and County of San Francisco has filed against the feds focusing on a different Executive Order the President has issued—this one seeking to rein in so-called sanctuary jurisdictions. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 8:20 am
City & County of San Francisco, Case No. 12-15070 (April 24, 2014) (slip opinion available here). [read post]
1 May 2007, 12:15 am
City and County of San Francisco, (9th Cir., April 30, 2007), the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals rejected equal protection and First Amendment challenges to San Francisco's enforcement of its noise and its permit ordinances against Christian evangelists seeking to use sound amplification equipment for their preaching in the streets and parks of San Francisco. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 8:34 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
  April 24, 2014), overturned an order denying class certification of age discrimination claims filed by a group of police officers against the City and County of San Francisco. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 8:18 pm by binder'sblog
San Francisco and Seattle may be the most progressive cities in America, but the residents are finally fed up with the crime, homeless, riots, and remote earning. [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 10:29 am by Karen Gullo
San Francisco Police Violated City Law in Using Private Camera NetworkSan Francisco—On Friday, Jan. 14, at 9:30 am, the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) and the ACLU of Northern California will ask a California state court to find that the San Francisco Police Department (SFPD) violated city law when it used a network of non-city surveillance cameras to spy on Black-led protests in 2020 against… [read post]
18 May 2015, 10:01 am by Lyle Denniston
The Court had taken the case of City and County of San Francisco v. [read post]
27 Sep 2021, 1:53 pm by Saira Hussain
In October 2020, on behalf of three activists of color, we sued the City and County of San Francisco for violating the city’s landmark Surveillance Technology Ordinance. [read post]
17 Aug 2017, 3:33 am by NCC Staff
The city of San Francisco has filed its second sanctuary city lawsuit against the Trump Administration, claiming that it will lose $1.5 million in JAG grant funds, and it is coordinating its efforts with Becarra’s office. [read post]
21 May 2015, 7:55 am by Amy Howe
Monday’s decision in City and County of San Francisco v. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 9:08 am by Lawrence Taylor
In April 2010, Santa Clara County authorities learned that condensation was building up in the device, the Alco-Sensor V, that San Jose and Palo Alto police had been using for nearly all of 2010, resulting in erratic readings. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 9:36 am by Megan Lewis
A California Court of Appeal recently found that the City and County of San Francisco’s disciplinary procedure for police officers is not compliant with the Public Safety Officers Procedural Bill of Rights Act (“POBRA”), which requires that all California law enforcement agencies provide officers with certain minimum procedural rights. [read post]
23 May 2011, 5:00 am by Kevin
From a complaint filed last week in San Francisco:  Michael M ____ v. [read post]