Search for: "SANCHEZ v. NEW MEXICO" Results 41 - 60 of 60
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Oct 2011, 11:31 am
The Court relied upon the 2003 New Mexico Supreme Court case of Lozoya v. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 7:24 am by Kiran Bhat
New Mexico, in which the Court held that the Confrontation Clause prohibits prosecutors from introducing a lab report through the in-court testimony of an analyst who did not sign the document or observe the tests discussed in the report. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
No such constraints appear to have operated in other areas of New Zealand law, and the case had in fact been sent back to New Zealand by the Privy Council to reconsider the proceedings in light of the Reynolds principles (Lange v Atkinson [2000] 1 NZLR 257), so I view these perceived differences with some suspicion. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 5:45 pm by Collins & Collins
" The New Mexico Court of Appeals has reaffirmed this loose and vague standard in State v. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 12:01 am
Take, for example, last week’s oral arguments before the Supreme Court in Salazar v. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 4:11 pm
The New Mexico Court of Appeals has struck one more blow against these well-intentioned drivers in State v. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 6:00 am
The US systematically denied such access to many foreign nationals now on death rows throughout the US, and the interplay between the International Court of Justice (ICJ) and US Supreme Court has given rise to ongoing drama in a series of decisions in both courts: Breard (Paraguay), LaGrand (Germany), Sanchez-Llamas (Mexico and Honduras), and most recently, Medellin v. [read post]
13 May 2008, 1:35 pm
Genao-Sanchez, No. 05-1402 Sentence for drug conspiracy, conspiring to use a firearm in furtherance of a drug conspiracy, and aiding and abetting the commission of a crime, is vacated and remanded where: 1) the district court's failure to convene a new sentencing hearing deprived defendant the opportunity to argue his position both as to matters of fact relevant to sentencing, and as to the appropriate sentence to be imposed; and 2) thus, the error was prejudicial. [read post]
19 Sep 2007, 4:16 am
Sep. 6, 2007)(New Mexico).Appeal of sentence for illegal reentry to United States after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. [read post]
27 Mar 2007, 8:30 am
" The latter point, Texas argued, was settled in the Court's decision last Term in Sanchez-Llamas v. [read post]