Search for: "SANDS v. STATE" Results 21 - 40 of 1,214
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 May 2018, 5:00 am by Rick Hills
" When I am confronted by loose language in a new precedent, my inclination is to sand... [read post]
23 Dec 2012, 9:01 pm by Neil Cahn
Among the rulings involving Sand, a 2002 decision of the Appellate Division Second Department, in Sand v. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 5:00 am by Victoria VanBuren
On July 21, 2010 the Supreme Court of Wisconsin decided Sands v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 11:02 am by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
The state set that line because it is spending real money piling sand onto eroded beaches and officials don't want that dynamic line moving in and out with erosion and accretion (the gradual deposition of sand by natural forces).The property owners said the ECL takes away their right to gain new dry land created by the state filling seaward of the high tide line and by accretion. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 3:16 pm
But now that I've read it, when the prosecutor politely sends me a letter asking me to voluntarily show up to court in order to save the state the time and hassle of arresting me, I'm definitely going to tell them to pound sand. [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 8:58 am by Michael Geist
The government seemed to admit the very limited scope of the provision during an earlier House of Commons debate, when Conservative MP Bob Dechert stated: In R. v. [read post]