Search for: "SANDVIK INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AB v. KENNAMETAL INC." Results 1 - 5 of 5
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Nov 2012, 7:55 am by stevehansen
An additional example of this problem is described in Sandvik Intellectual Property AB v. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 6:58 am
  Therefore, it was not obvious to test pregabalin – it might be obvious to test gabapentin, but even here the judge considered that the skilled team would have little expectation of success.InsufficiencyAccording to the caselaw relating to sufficiency developed in MedImmune Ltd v Novartis Pharmaceuticals UK Ltd [2011] EWHC 1699 (Pat) at [458]-[484] and summarised in Sandvik Intellectual Property AB v Kennametal UK… [read post]