Search for: "SAYED v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER"
Results 21 - 40
of 180
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Mar 2019, 7:28 pm
Section 405(g) provides that “[a]ny individual, after any final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security made after a hearing to which he was a party, … may obtain review of such decision by a civil action. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 11:13 am
New satellite imagery shows that Sudanese security forces continue to commit “war crimes and other serious human rights violations” in Darfur, Amnesty International says. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 2:06 pm
Securities and Exchange Commission, along with its other much-anticipated decisions, Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. v. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm
The upshot: so long as a defendant says what the SEC wants to hear (or says nothing at all), he does not violate the No-Admit-No-Deny Provision. [read post]
17 Oct 2018, 4:19 pm
Particularly designed with an eye to helping health care providers that work as solo practitioners or in groups with 10 or less health care providers and their business associates identify risks and vulnerabilities to ePHI, OCR says the updated SRA Tool “provides enhanced functionality to document how such organizations can implement or plan to implement appropriate security measures to protect ePHI” and incorporates new features to make the tool “more user… [read post]
26 Jul 2020, 7:28 pm
Serge Joyal cited the Supreme Court of Canada decision in Canada (Information Commissioner) v. [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 10:52 am
In SEC v. [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 5:56 am
See also pages 30-32 of the brief for former INS commissioners.) [read post]
24 Aug 2022, 5:01 am
After West Virginia v. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 9:30 pm
Then the administrator made the statutorily required finding–say, that the dealer was of bad business repute or that one of his transactions was fraudulent.Dealers who lost before the administrator could appeal to a state appellate court. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 7:59 am
No action against the United States, the Commissioner of Social Security, or any officer or employee thereof shall be brought under section 1331 . [read post]
30 Mar 2014, 5:30 am
R. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 5:37 pm
Luis V. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 7:21 am
In Collins v. [read post]
17 Mar 2023, 1:08 pm
Nugent asserted that privately-operated social media platforms may actually constitute public spaces in which first amendment protections are enhanced, based on Marsh v. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 7:24 am
Its purpose is to "monitor, investigate, and submit to congress an annual report on the national security implications of the bilateral trade and economic relationship between the United States and the People’s Republic of China, and to provide recommendations, where appropriate, to Congress for legislative and administrative action. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 2:58 pm
Big Tech decides who gets to speak, what they can say, and who gets to listen to that speech. [read post]
16 Feb 2020, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court will soon hear argument on Seila Law v. [read post]
7 Jul 2019, 4:23 pm
The Press Gazette had a piece “News industry fears over draft child data protections ‘unfounded’, says Information Commissioner”. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 2:35 pm
Social Security And Taxes Many senior citizens preparing for retirement may not realize that their Social Security income could be taxable under certain conditions. [read post]
