Search for: "SEARS, ROEBUCK & COMPANY v. Green" Results 1 - 5 of 5
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jun 2010, 3:51 pm by PaulKostro
Sears Roebuck & Co., 138 N.J. 2 (1994), stating: In 1960, the Legislature passed the Consumer Fraud Act “to permit the Attorney General to combat the increasingly widespread practice of defrauding the consumer. [read post]
23 Dec 2007, 8:00 pm
: (IPEG),More on the implementation of the London Agreement and patent cost reduction in Europe: (Patent Baristas),ECJ rules that EU legislative obligations cannot be enforced in any Member State if that legislation has not been published in the Official Journal in the language of that Member State (Case C-161/06  OlomoucSkoma-Lux sro v Celni reditelstvi Olumouc): (IPKat),EPO fighting complex appl [read post]
1 Nov 2008, 3:12 am
(Intellectual Property Marketing Advisor) (IP finance) New book lifts lid on IP value creation 'From Assets to Profits: Competing for IP Value and Return' (IAM) Open letter to World Customs Organisation concerning increased enforcement of intellectual property (IP Justice) Panel: WTO cross-retaliation could bring compliance but political pressure high (Intellectual Property Watch) Push continues for TRIPS biodiversity amendment, geographical indications extension (Intellectual Property… [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
’ paper by Graeme Clark SC (IP Down Under) Full Federal Court decision concerning brand reputation in context of ‘lookalike’ products and famous brands: Hansen Beverage Company v Bickfords (Australia) Pty Ltd (Mallesons Stephen Jaques) Federal Court holds that grace period applicable to a ‘parent patent’ is different to that of its divisional ‘child’: Mont Adventure Equipment v Phoenix Leisure Group (IP… [read post]