Search for: "SEARS, ROEBUCK AND COMPANY v. BAKER"
Results 1 - 5
of 5
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Aug 2007, 5:04 am
Sears, Roebuck & Co., 645 F.2d 511, 512 n. 1 (5th Cir.1981) ("[C]ross claims are permissive rather than compulsory[,] and a party to an action has the option to pursue [them] in an independent action. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 11:02 am
” Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. [read post]
30 May 2008, 9:09 am
: (Spicy IP), India: DCGI preparing document to implement patent-registration linkage: (Spicy IP), New Zealand: Generic pharmaceutical companies taking advantage of NZ IP laws and medicines regulations: (International Law Office), Uganda: Cipla licenses ARV technology into Uganda: (Afro-IP), US: Money saved through generic prescriptions: (GenericsWeb), US: Government plans to keep close tab on drug patent settlements: (GenericsWeb), US: FTC reports 14 deals to delay generics in 2007:… [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
Court of First Instance rejects Lego’s appeal against OHIM’s Board of Appeals decision that Lego brick shape not registrable as a Community trade mark (Ars Technica) (Techdirt) OHIM opposition quality standards – the Office responds (IPKat) Charlie McCreevy puts forward proposal to reduce CTM fees by about 40% (Managing Intellectual Property) (Class 46) New protected geographical indications: French PGI Boeuf de Bazas for fresh meat and offal; Finnish PGI Kainuun… [read post]
28 May 2010, 9:50 pm
Dutch companies as both producers and users: Many more product innovations (made in the role of producer) are protected with IP (45% v.s. 11%); 85% of process innovations (made in the role of user) voluntarily help with copying/transfer of knowledge, because what they want is the product, compared to 17% of producer/product innovations. [read post]
