Search for: "SEATTLE BUILDING COUNCIL v. City of Seattle" Results 21 - 40 of 51
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Sep 2019, 1:19 pm by Jason Kelley
"In the end, we cannot build a better world unless we envision it and talk about it. [read post]
19 Dec 2018, 3:00 am by Kevin Kaufman
Ideas spread and policies can build their own momentum. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 9:30 pm by Bobby Chen
The announcement came after a memorandum from Jersey City’s Chief Prosecutor Jacob V. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 10:50 am by David Kris
We met also with advisors to the Israeli National Security Council, a justice of the Israeli Supreme Court, and noted experts in international law. [read post]
9 Jan 2015, 7:32 am by William Consovoy
Florida Gulf Coast Building & Construction Trades Council famously invite courts to read statutes more expansively than the text might allow in order to avoid constitutional issues. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 7:37 pm by Ezra Rosser
(Re)Emerging Issues The Seattle/Louisville Decision and the Future of Race-Conscious Programs Philip Tegeler Separate ≠ Equal: Mexican Americans Before Brown v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 4:21 am by Marie Louise
(IAM) Two tools for selecting a suggestive trademark over a descriptive trademark (Seattle Trademark Lawyer) TRIPS Council (24-25 Oct 2011) will discuss Para 6 implementation, Australia’s tobacco plain packaging bill 2011 and enforcement (KEI)   Global – Patents Private and social costs of patent trolls (IP finance) Featured resource: ArchPatent (Patent Quality Matters)   Australia APO: Assuming next-day delivery of mail an ‘error’: TransLang… [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 1:22 pm by Steven M. Taber
Tanco’s facility at 10520 Wolcott Drive, Kansas City, Kan., did not have an FRP in place at the time of a May 2009 EPA inspection, in violation of the federal Clean Water Act (CWA), according to an administrative consent agreement and final order filed in Kansas City, Kan. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 6:31 am
- Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf decision in Zappa Family Trust trade mark infringement action against Zappa fans (Class 46) (IPKat) A map, a copyright dispute and the Bundesverfassungsgericht (IPKat) Bundespatentgericht decides on registrability of ‘Speicherstadt’ (city of warehouses) (Class 46) Bundespatentgericht headnote on registrability of shape mark depicting a firearm (‘Schusswaffe’) (Class 46)     India National Conference on… [read post]
4 Jul 2010, 6:02 pm by Duncan
– Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf decision in Zappa Family Trust trade mark infringement action against Zappa fans (Class 46) (IPKat) A map, a copyright dispute and the Bundesverfassungsgericht (IPKat) Bundespatentgericht decides on registrability of ‘Speicherstadt’ (city of warehouses) (Class 46) Bundespatentgericht headnote on registrability of shape mark depicting a firearm (‘Schusswaffe’) (Class 46) India National Conference on building… [read post]