Search for: "SEC v. Hansen" Results 1 - 20 of 26
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Dec 2014, 3:26 am by Broc Romanek
Not soon after I blogged about a few members of the US Supreme Court questioning the deference given to the SEC in the enforcement context, a federal court rules against a Corp Fin no-action response in the shareholder proposal context in Trinity Wall Street v Wal-Mart Stores. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 4:50 pm by Colin O'Keefe
Judge Rakoff Rejects the SEC-Citi Settlement, But Is "Truth" Really the Purpose of Any Settlement and Does the SEC Need the Courts to Settle its Cases? [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 4:46 am by Broc Romanek
Second Circuit Finally Delivers an Opinion on PSLRA's Forward-Looking Information Safe Harbor Recently, the Second Circuit issued its first opinion analyzing the PSLRA's safe harbor for forward-looking statements in Slayton v. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 4:34 pm by Rhead Enion
 Second, in Defenders of Wildlife v. [read post]
3 Feb 2008, 10:20 pm
  By doing so, SOX specifically addresses conflicts that arise when one professional entity performs work for a client but also owes fiduciary duties to the investing public and company shareholders. [28] SOX intimidated KPMG into disbanding their global legal entity, KLegal, which employed mover than 3,000 lawyers in 60 countries. [29]  However, PriceWaterhouseCoopers, Deloitte & Touche, and Ernst & Young have no intentions of doing the same, despite added… [read post]
19 May 2011, 10:47 am by Steven Hansen
This was a long time in coming given that the 16 CFR 1512 standard was issued in 1978. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 10:23 am by Ron Coleman
My first involvement in such a case was in a case called Pearson v. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 4:29 am by Ron Coleman
The defendants respond that the importation right, like the distribution right in 106(3), is subject to the First Sale limitations in Sec. 109(a). [read post]