Search for: "SEC v. Zimmerman"
Results 1 - 15
of 15
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Dec 2007, 12:40 am
Yesterday in United States v. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 7:00 am
The Federal Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a monetary award of nearly $600,000 to Defendant and accused infringer Flagstar and against patentee Eon-Net and its counsel Zimmerman under 35 U.S.C. sec. 285 (”an exceptional case” ruling ) and Fed.R. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 11:00 am
On March 25, 2019 car rental giant Hertz Corporation filed a complaint against its former CEO (Mark Frissora), CFO (Elyse Douglas), and General Counsel (John Zimmerman) pursuant to its Compensation Recovery Policy (“Hertz Clawback Provisions”).Hertz Corp. v. [read post]
21 Apr 2012, 12:07 pm
See also Wallace v. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 7:46 pm
In the case of U.S. v. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 6:27 am
Alan Dershowitz: Zimmerman Arrest Affidavit 'Irresponsible And Unethical' Fundy Settlement v. [read post]
31 May 2011, 6:53 am
Lynch v. [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 6:54 am
No. 80 Sec. 3(B)(1) (“In enacting section 2305.131 of the Revised Code in this act, it is the intent of the General Assembly . . . [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 5:12 am
No. 80 Sec. 3(B)(1) (“In enacting section 2305.131 of the Revised Code in this act, it is the intent of the General Assembly . . . [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 8:05 am
Considered a "landmark case", Epperson v. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 8:46 am
Concepcion and Walmart v. [read post]
30 Dec 2012, 9:13 pm
In Lafler v. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 7:05 pm
§ 7410’s express limit on the EPA’s disapproval authority and decisions of other courts of appeals, the EPA may substitute its own policy preferences for a state’s about the appropriate means of controlling air pollution within that state, without identifying any applicable “requirement of th[e] [Clean Air Act]” with which the state’s chosen means would interfere; and (2) whether the panel erred under SEC v. [read post]
13 Sep 2009, 7:24 pm
Sec. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 1:22 pm
But we guess it bears repeating.The Supreme Court held in Day & Zimmerman, Inc. v. [read post]
