Search for: "SELLERS v. TERRITORY" Results 1 - 20 of 164
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jul 2010, 11:32 am by Daithí
Jacobsen v Katzer, now settled), or the EULA issues raised in MDY v Blizzard and the issues highlighted through Amazon’s Orwellian mess. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 6:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
As Justice Kennedy explained: The physical presence rule has long been criticized as giving out-of-state sellers an advantage. [read post]
22 Jul 2018, 1:39 pm
Forty-one States, two Territories, and the District of Columbia now ask this Court to reject the test formulated in Quill. [read post]
22 Jul 2009, 8:26 am
But unlike sellers of a business, franchisees often have little bargaining power.The recent case of Bad Ass Coffee Co. of Hawaii, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 2:59 am
It is the task of the national courts to assess on a case-by-case basis whether relevant factors exist, on the basis of which it may be concluded that an offer for sale or an advertisement displayed on an online marketplace accessible from the territory covered by the trade mark is targeted at consumers in that territory [... or here]. 2. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 5:26 pm by Steven
The ruling comes in the case of John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Mar 2018, 7:27 am by John Jascob
The appellate panel began by noting that Morrison said nothing about the CEA’s territorial reach, and only once, in Loginovskaya v. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 8:04 am
The order was placed and paid for through the seller's English website and the watch was posted to him from Hong Kong. [read post]