Search for: "SETTLES v. UNIVERSAL PROTECTION SERVICES, LLC" Results 1 - 20 of 176
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Apr 2023, 8:50 am by Eric Goldman
Jumio already settled a BIPA case, but the court says that only could protect Jumio before June 23, 2019. [read post]
6 Sep 2021, 11:52 am by Eric Goldman
It’s hard to draw a broader lesson from this ruling other than the obvious lesson that Internet services need to pay close attention to takedown notices alleging sex trafficking. [read post]
14 Jan 2018, 4:32 pm by INFORRM
United States The Socially Aware Blog has a post which considers a recent decision made by the Sixth Circuit in Signature Management Team, LLC v. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 8:58 am by David Post
First, the facts, as summarized in the Supreme Court's majority opinion (emphases added): "Through her business, 303 Creative LLC, Lorie Smith offers website and graphic design, marketing advice, and social media management services. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 3:39 am
In settling the case, the parties submitted to the court a Final Consent Judgment, which would result in assignment to the University of applicants’ rights in the HOUNDSTOOTH MAFIA mark, including the opposed application. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 7:44 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Embedding as implicating any of the exclusive rights: thought it was settled; isn’t: McGucken v. [read post]
9 May 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
There is reason to believe the SEC’s new universal proxy Rule 14a-19 will result in more stockholder nominees being elected to the boards of public companies. [read post]
26 Aug 2015, 9:06 am by Eric Goldman
Roberts is a trademark expert at the University of New Hampshire School of Law. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 2:48 pm by Kevin LaCroix
John Reed Stark As I noted in a recent post, on June 8, 2016, the SEC, in what one commentator called “the most significant SEC cybersecurity-related action to date,” announced that Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC had agreed to pay a $1 million penalty to settle charges that as a result of its alleged failure to adopt written policies and procedures reasonably designed to protect customer data, some customer information was hacked and offered for sale online. [read post]