Search for: "SHARPE v. REED" Results 1 - 20 of 119
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jan 2019, 12:08 am by INFORRM
Today, 24 January 2019, five Supreme Court judges (Lord Reed, Lord Kerr, Lady Black, Lord Briggs and Lord Kitchin) will hear Stocker v Stocker UKSC 2018/0045, an appeal against the 12 February 2018 Court of Appeal decision of Lady Justice Sharp, with whom Lord Justice McFarlane and Sir John Laws concurred ([2018] EWCA Civ 170). [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 7:19 pm by INFORRM
The five Supreme Court judges (Lord Reed, Lord Kerr, Lady Black, Lord Briggs and Lord Kitchin) unanimously overturned the 12 February 2018 Court of Appeal decision given by Lady Justice Sharp, Lord Justice McFarlane and Sir John Laws ([2018] EWCA Civ 170). [read post]
23 Mar 2018, 5:46 am by INFORRM
On 21 March 2018 the Supreme Court (Lords Kerr and Reed and Lady Black) granted the defendants permission to appeal in the case of Lachaux v Independent Print. [read post]
Today, 24 January 2019, five Supreme Court judges (Lord Reed, Lord Kerr, Lady Black, Lord Briggs and Lord Kitchin) will hear Stocker v Stocker UKSC 2018/0045, an appeal against the 12 February 2018 Court of Appeal decision of Lady Justice Sharp, with whom Lord Justice McFarlane and Sir John Laws concurred ([2018] EWCA Civ 170). [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 9:11 pm by Prof. Akhil Reed Amar, guest-blogging
Akhil Reed Amar, guest-blogging) In a recent posting, Ilya Somin says the following: “Beginning with the famous case of Bolling v. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 5:33 am by Howard Wasserman
A basically unanimous Supreme Court yesterday decided Reed Elsevier, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Apr 2021, 4:39 pm by INFORRM
A panel made up of Lord Reed, Lady Arden and Lords Sales, Leggatt and Burrows will decide whether, following the decision in Merricks v MasterCard [2020] UKSC 51, the winds of group litigation continue to blow in a pro-consumer direction. [read post]
20 Mar 2008, 7:36 am
Supreme Court twice, leading to a sharp rebuke on Texas' review of this death penalty case, first in Miller-El v.Cockrell, then in Miller-El v. [read post]
3 May 2017, 9:36 am by Andrew Hamm
Reed ruled that the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment prohibited discrimination on the basis of sex, and 1973, when the court in Frontiero v. [read post]
16 May 2012, 12:22 pm by Bexis
First, Bexis wishes to welcome the Blog's readership from his new office at Reed Smith. [read post]
17 May 2018, 1:06 pm by Blake Marcus
From Sharpe, 470 U.S. at 668 (“in determining the reasonable duration of a stop, it is appropriate to examine whether the police diligently pursued the investigation. [read post]
16 May 2022, 4:00 am by James Romoser
Wade (Akhil Reed Amar, The Wall Street Journal) Why Roe v. [read post]
9 Aug 2017, 3:09 am by AIDAN WILLS MATRIX
The Court of Appeal unanimously dismissed Mr Khuja’s appeal, with Sharp LJ giving the only judgment. [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 10:55 am
The result would be a sharp decline in quality of care. [read post]