Search for: "SHAW v. LORD"
Results 1 - 20
of 38
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 May 2013, 12:44 pm
The single biggest problem in communication is the illusion that it has taken place.George Bernard Shaw Law blogging, despite the predictions of the gurus and prognosticators, continues to thrive. [read post]
30 May 2013, 12:44 pm
The single biggest problem in communication is the illusion that it has taken place.George Bernard Shaw Law blogging, despite the predictions of the gurus and prognosticators, continues to thrive. [read post]
1 Sep 2022, 12:57 pm
Hannon v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2015] EMLR 1, Richard v BBC [2019] Ch 169 and Sicri v Associated Newspapers Ltd [2021] 4 WLR 9). [read post]
16 Feb 2009, 5:55 am
For Southwark: Richard Drabble QC and Shaw Kelly, instructed by Southwark Legal [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 8:59 am
” Kerr v. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 4:46 pm
Shaw, 89 F. 313, 315 (CC SD Iowa 1893); see 2 W. [read post]
4 Jul 2010, 2:03 pm
The list of those down to speak is, Baron McIntosh, Lords Bach, Pannick and Willis, Baroness Bonham-Carter, Lord Borrie, Baroness Buscombe, Lords Fowler and Goodhart, Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town, Lord Hunt of Wirral, Baroness Kennedy of The Shaws, Lord Lester, Lord McNally, Lord Ramsbotham, Lord Taverne, Lord Thomas of Gresford, Lord Triesman and Baroness Young of Hornsey. [read post]
18 Oct 2015, 9:32 am
As Lord Hoffmann said in the Privy Council libel case of Gleaner v Abrahams ([2004] 1 AC 628) “Personal injury awards are almost always made in actions based on negligence or breach of statutory duty rather than intentional wrongdoing. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 11:55 am
It was famously articulated in the speeches in Scott v Scott [1913] AC 417 – see particularly at [1913] AC 417, 438, 463 and 477, per Lord Haldane LC, Lord Atkinson, and Lord Shaw of Dunfermline respectively. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 2:02 am
Thus, in Watson, Laidlaw & Co Ltd v Pott, Cassels and Williamson (1914) 31 RPC 104, Lord Shaw expressed the principle: wherever an abstraction or invasion of property has occurred, then, unless such abstraction or invasion were to be sanctioned by law, the law ought to yield a recompense under the category or principle, as I say, of price or hire. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 1:00 am
What have Samuel Beckett, James Joyce, George B Shaw, and William B Yeats in common? [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 5:39 am
Robin Shaw & Paul Chamberlain (Davenport Lyons), Communications Law Comms. [read post]
18 Oct 2013, 7:23 am
” From the BBC, this time Danny Shaw, came a question to Lord Neuberger about his previously expressed concerns about cuts to legal aid. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 5:57 pm
Jeremy Bentham said in a well known passage quoted by Lord Shaw of Dunfermline in Scott v Scott [1913] AC 417, 477: Publicity is the very soul of justice. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 11:01 am
Article 6 of the Convention was specifically drafted to replicate the House of Lords’ ringing affirmation of open justice in the seminal early twentieth century decision of the House of Lords in Scott v Scott. [read post]
15 Apr 2018, 4:02 pm
The judgment was given by Lord Reed NPJ. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 12:48 am
Juliet Shaw describes her legal battle against the Daily Mail, as a litigant in person, on the Justice Gap website. [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 4:00 am
Not only does this strategy undermine our commitment to a right of access to the courts, and ignore the Supreme Court of Canada’s clear statement in Pintea v John that SRLs cannot and should not be treated the same way as expert counsel, but by punishing SRLs for their unintended mistakes with vexatious litigant and court restriction orders, this strategy is also making the public angrier and even more indignant at their treatment in Canada’s Access to Justice crisis. [read post]
10 Dec 2023, 4:59 am
Carly Forrest et al, Lexology: Vicarious Liability in Scotland – the retreat continues: on the recent Inner House judgment in C & S v Shaw and Live Active Leisure [2023] CSIH 36. [read post]
14 May 2012, 7:17 am
To the argument that the patentee could therefore not have an award of damages, Lord Shaw said this: …wherever an abstraction or invasion of property has occurred, then, unless such abstraction or invasion were to be sanctioned by law, the law ought to yield a recompense under the category or principle, as I say, either of price or of hire. [read post]
