Search for: "SHELL OIL COMPANY v. CORPORATION COMMISSION" Results 21 - 32 of 32
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Dec 2011, 12:22 am by Kevin LaCroix
”[15] One such example is the landmark $352 million Royal Dutch Shell settlement, which arose from allegations by European investors that Shell overstated its oil and gas reserves.[16] As such, the Netherlands might be the new “place to [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 11:15 am by Steven M. Taber
– United States Environmental Protection Agency, July 26, 2010 Rhode Island Airport Corporation and its demolition contractors, O.R. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 6:42 am by lawmrh
The Corporation Service Company offers a list of complimentary Web Seminars – Live Webinars – Archived Recordings | CSCGlobal.com. [read post]
17 Oct 2008, 2:40 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: President signs PRO IP Bill into law (The Counterfeit Blog) (Intellectual Property Watch) (Techdirt) (Out-Law) (Counterfeit Chic) (Public Knowledge) (Ars Technica) (Law360) (US Intellectual Property Law & Policy News) CAFC vacates ITC ban on importing Qualcomm chips: Kyocera v International Trade Commission (Ars… [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 4:22 am by Dianne Saxe
Where are these lines properly drawn between residential and corporate neighbours in this modem era of environmental stewardship? [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 3:44 pm by admin
Click Here Two Shell Chemical Companies Agree to Reduce Harmful Emissions Under Comprehensive Clean Air Act Settlements/Agreements reduce more than 1,450 tons of harmful air emissions annually. [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
(Techdirt) How companies can cash in on innovations and patents (IP Frontline) International Property Rights Index 2009 - New report identifies world’s most IP-friendly country, but trade marks are ignored (IAM) What do clients want? [read post]
18 Sep 2008, 8:56 pm
Issue: Whether an Arizona commission violated the free speech rights of an anti-abortion organization by denying its application for a specialty “Choose Life” license plate. [read post]
2 May 2008, 7:00 am
: (Patent Baristas), US: How to avoid a permanent injunction: the lessons of Amgen v Hoffman-LaRoche: (Patent Docs), US: Jarvik Heart’s PTE request based on PMA shell/module submission dates flatlines; ruling on initiation of PTE ‘review period’ mirrors FDA policy for ‘fast track’ products: (FDA Law Blog) Pharma & Biotech - Products Kytril (Granisetron) – Exclusivity ‘parking’… [read post]