Search for: "SIMPSON v. BAKER"
Results 1 - 20
of 27
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Aug 2010, 3:35 am
BAKER, -v.- CHARLES SIMPSON, WINDELS MARX LANE & MITTENDORF, LLP is the story of a Chapter 7 petitioner whose case was converted into a Chapter 11 proceeding. [read post]
29 May 2009, 12:12 pm
Jerry practiced law in New York and Los Angeles at Simpson Thacher and Quinn Emanuel before co-founding Baker Marquart Crone & Hawxhurst LLP in LA. [read post]
12 May 2022, 8:54 am
Baker, et al. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 9:29 am
The circuit court primarily utilized a Kentucky Supreme Court case, Baker v. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 2:42 am
The Second Circuit, in Baker v, Simpson ruled that malpractice occurring a bankruptcy "arises under" the bankruptcy court's jurisdiction. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 2:05 pm
In Sweeny v Ireland [2017] IEHC 702 (23 November 2017) Baker J in the High Court struck down section 9(1)(b) of the Offences Against the State (Amendment) Act, 1998 (also here), which provided for a wide offence of withholding material information from Gardaí, on the grounds that it infringed the right to silence derived from the right to freedom of expression in Article 40. [read post]
13 Jan 2018, 3:51 am
Mattis, Dalmazzi v. [read post]
20 Jan 2018, 5:13 am
On Tuesday, the Supreme Court heard arguments in Dalmazzi v. [read post]
21 Jul 2007, 8:28 am
Plaintiff-Appellant, Marie Helms ("Helms"), appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of Defendants-Appellees George Zubaty and Winslow Baker (Gallatin County, Kentucky, employees) and Brent Caldwell, Donnie Gould, and Travis Simpson (City of Warsaw, Kentucky, employees) (collectively "Defendants"), on Helms's claims arising under 42 U.S.C. [read post]
23 May 2009, 11:28 am
Simpson, A.W.B., ed. [read post]
14 Jun 2020, 12:26 pm
“Bill” Priestap, Sarah Raskin, Steve Ricchetti, Susan Rice, Rod Rosenstein, Gabriel Sanz-Rexach, Nathan Sheets, Elizabeth Sherwood-Randall, Glenn Simpson, Steve Somma, Peter Strzok, Michael Sussman, Adam Szubin, Jonathan Winer, Christopher Wray, and Sally Yates.According to both President Trump (in his personal capacity) and the Solicitor General of the United States, this Judiciary Committee investigation is unconstitutional, and therefore recipients of the subpoenas need not… [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 9:10 am
(The decision: Tropp v. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 11:37 am
There was once a time in Strasbourg jurisprudence that if a right was found to be “squarely within the domain of public law, having no private law analogy and no repercussions on private rights or obligations”, that would be fatal to the claim to a civil right under Article 6 (Simpson v. [read post]
31 Aug 2009, 3:55 am
Corp. v. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 7:43 am
Jones III, Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz, PC, Jackson, Miss. [read post]
1 Sep 2009, 3:04 am
River Water Conservation Dist. v. [read post]
13 Jun 2009, 2:42 pm
District Court for the Central District of California, urging dismissal of Smelt v. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 9:18 am
David Baker, chair of Baker Robbins & Co., provides better queries for a healthier, more productive conversation. [read post]
16 Nov 2018, 8:00 am
Simpson also served at Camp Joseph E. [read post]
6 May 2015, 11:27 am
Eight days before the attack, in response to a tweet by Simpson about the alleged oppression of Muslims, Miski tweeted at Simpson, “One individual is able to put a whole nation onto it’s [sic] knees. [read post]
