Search for: "SIMS v. DAY" Results 41 - 60 of 230
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Apr 2018, 7:00 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 28959, Feb. 22, 2018), allowed an inmate to move ahead with retaliation, free exercise and California Bane Act claims complaining that a correctional officer poured bleach on his legal papers and his prayer rug.In Sims v. [read post]
28 Aug 2016, 1:11 pm by Patrick E. Knie
Related Blog Posts: South Carolina’s Statute of Limitations for Medical Malpractice Lawsuits Was Not Tolled, Despite Alleged Victim’s Mental Incapacity – Sims v. [read post]
25 Sep 2016, 4:53 pm by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 127018 (MD PA, Sept. 19, 2016), a Pennsylvania federal district court held that where an inmate refused to provide a written indication of his religious preference, prison officials could not be found to have substantially burdened the exercise of his unknown belief.In Sims v. [read post]
8 May 2015, 5:25 am
 Over to Daniel:This Kat bears belated news of the most recent episode in the IPCom saga in the form of a decision from the Patents Court decision, handed down on 24 April 2015, in IPCom v HTC [IPCOM GmbH & Co Kg v HTC Europe Co Ltd & Ors [2015] EWHC 1034 (Pat) (24 April 2015)].The decision relates to the European Patent (UK) 1 841 268 belonging to IPCom; a divisional of the patent EP 1 186 189. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 1:31 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
This will be heard in Court 2 for two days from 11 am each day. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 3:00 am by John Day
This is one of a series of posts that will excerpt sections from the third edition of my book, Day on Torts: Leading Tennessee Tort Cases. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 12:51 pm by Rory Little
Sims) were argued on the same day (October 9, Justice Brett Kavanaugh’s first day on the Supreme Court bench) as another ACCA case, Stokeling v. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 8:42 am by Kevin Smith, J.D.
There is a lot happening in fair use these days, even as we are still waiting for a decision in the Georgia State copyright infringement v. fair use case. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 4:42 pm by INFORRM
The degree to which this decision will affect our day to day practice will largely depend whether Masters and/or High Court Judges order serious harm to be tried as a preliminary issue, and on the circumstances of each case. [read post]