Search for: "SMALL, III V. STATE" Results 1 - 20 of 1,688
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 May 2012, 9:11 am by Rebecca Tushnet
As soon as you start saying it’s private party v. private party, must go to Article III. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 2:52 pm by Emily Theriault
For example, the government has special contracting priorities for veteran-owned small businesses (VOSBs) and service-disabled veteran-owned small businesses (SDVOSBs), as well as women-owned small businesses (WOSBs) and economically-disadvantaged women-owned small businesses (EDWOSBs), and others, like the 8(a) business development program and small businesses more generally. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 7:32 pm by My name
Charles Maddy III to the House Committee on Financial Services January 26, 2011. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 1:13 pm by David Klein
Currently pending before the United States Supreme Court is the matter of Acheson Hotels, LLC v. [read post]
11 May 2018, 4:00 am by Ingrid Wuerth
” The phrase “those in which a State shall be Party” refers back to Article III, Section 2, Clause 2 of the Constitution, as the Supreme Court reasoned in State of California v. [read post]
21 May 2022, 10:04 am
Kohn Announces 2022 Run for Small Firm Governor on FINRA Board of Governors2Cir Says Failure to Disclose SEC Investigation Is Material MisrepresentationJoseph Noto, Garden State Tire Corp., Stephens Johnson, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. 22nd Century Group, Inc., Henry Sicignano, III, John T. [read post]