Search for: "SMITH v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE"
Results 1 - 20
of 1,278
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Feb 2016, 9:01 pm
It’s not that the Court had departed from its usual approach in Smith. [read post]
5 Mar 2011, 12:55 pm
Department of Justice for Adult Prisons and... [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 1:48 pm
(See Butz v. [read post]
18 Nov 2022, 1:59 pm
Smith returned to the Justice Department in 2010 to serve as the head of the department’s Public Integrity Section, which focuses on the criminal prosecution of public officials for corruption and other offenses. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 8:00 am
The Department of Justice (DOJ) filed its brief on June 9, 2017. [read post]
2 Mar 2021, 8:38 pm
Stewart, Deputy Solicitor General, Department of Justice; Smith & Nephew was represented by Mark A. [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 12:12 pm
Smith, an important Fourteenth Amendment Due Process Clause property rights case that was heard by the Supreme Court today: Today, the Supreme Court hears Alvarez v. [read post]
25 Oct 2009, 4:33 pm
Smith provides an opportunity to restore the balance of justice to citizens. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 9:12 pm
In a Supreme Court session that could be described as anti-class-action, Smith v. [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 5:45 pm
To reach this conclusion, the court applied the four factors set forth in Smith v. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 12:25 pm
Gabrielle Girgis (University of Notre Dame - Department of Political Science) has posted A Strict Scrutiny Regime for Free Exercise Post-Smith on SSRN. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 9:59 am
[The Justices must sua sponte address Jack Smith's lack of standing.] [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 11:45 am
Maryland, and NLRB v. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 7:09 pm
Anna Marie Smith (Cornell University - Department of Government) has posted Reading Thurgood Marshall as a Liberal Democratic Theorist: Race, School Finance, and the Courts (Education, Justice, and Democracy, ed. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 5:38 am
” Smith v. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 2:44 pm
On June 16, Special Counsel Jack Smith submitted a motion for a protective order limiting disclosure of discovery information, as well as the proposed protective order, in the case of United States of America v. [read post]
11 Nov 2016, 9:53 am
Early last week the Court of Appeals reversed a decision of the First Department which held that the rule of law announced in People v Catu applies retroactively to pre-Catu convictions (People v Smith, 132 AD3d 511 [1st Dept 2015]) -- a decision I had labeled a "huge success for the criminal defense bar" in an October blog post.In People v Catu, the New York Court of Appeals held that the court must advise a defendant of the… [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 10:07 am
In Employment Division, Department of Human Resources of Oregon v. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 5:38 am
” Smith v. [read post]
27 May 2022, 11:21 am
In June 2021, the Supreme Court declined an invitation to overturn Employment Division, Department of Human Resources of Oregon v. [read post]
