Search for: "SMITH v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE"
Results 41 - 60
of 1,281
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Feb 2023, 5:27 am
The case is U.S. v. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 5:14 am
Nicola Giocoli, Department of Law, University of Pisa, has posted Elevating Competition: Classical Political Economy in Justice Peckham's Jurisprudence:The paper deals with the famous Lochner v. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 8:21 pm
Rather it merely quotes People v Zelke (203 AD2d 909), an earlier Fourth Department decision, which merely quoted People v Felman (141 AD2d 889) a decision of the Third Department which pre-dated the Court of Appeal decision in Delgado. [read post]
How Jack Smith May Charge Trump PAC with Fraudulent Fundraising Within the Bounds of First Amendment
24 Aug 2023, 5:55 am
For example, in 2023, the Department of Justice indicted Republican Congressman George Santos (NY-03). [read post]
10 Oct 2008, 8:45 pm
Although defendant failed to preserve that contention for our review, we exercise our power to review that contention as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice (see People v Fomby, 42 AD3d 894, 895; People v Valdez, 41 AD3d 1255, lv denied 9 NY3d 882).Last week, in People v Cambridge (2008 NY Slip Op 07435 [10/3/08]) the Court went a step further and corrected such an unpreserved error, in the interest of justice, depsite there being a valid… [read post]
6 Mar 2020, 1:30 am
Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC, Defendant (Final Approval Order, United States District Court for the Northern District of California)Justice Department Wins Historic Arbitration of a Merger Dispute / Novelis Inc. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 12:07 pm
The decision in United States v. [read post]
9 Apr 2008, 12:02 pm
Smith v. [read post]
21 Dec 2018, 12:55 pm
The February sitting begins on February 19 with Department of Commerce v. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 6:46 am
This post will cover the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Smith v. [read post]
21 Apr 2024, 2:25 pm
[Defendant standing must exist at all stages of any litigation and must be raised by the justices of the Supreme Court even if the litigants themselves fail to raise it] On Thursday, April 25th the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 4:14 am
Smith Judge Robert S. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 11:02 am
Tex. 1996); Smith v. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 6:00 am
Munez-Morales v. [read post]
4 May 2016, 8:14 pm
Justice Smith found that the last will executed by Ms. [read post]
15 May 2013, 9:56 am
Smith, 647 F.3d 619 (6th Cir. 2011)), suffer from alcoholism during trial (People v. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 5:36 am
Oakes v. [read post]
8 Feb 2007, 1:22 pm
But just like Justice Potter Stewart, "we know it when we see it" -- and Anna Nicole Smith was it. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 6:00 am
Jiang v. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 6:44 am
Supreme Court decision in Berghuis v Smith. [read post]
