Search for: "SMITH v. DHS " Results 1 - 20 of 72
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Apr 2012, 1:20 pm by Madelaine Lane
On Friday, April 13, 2012, the Michigan Supreme Court denied one application for leave to appeal and denied the defendant’s application to bypass the Court of Appeals in Smith v. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 3:01 am by Kristina Araya
The Michigan Court of Appeals considered several issues with respect to cash-assistance benefits under the Family Independence Program (FIP) in the consolidated appeals of Smith v. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 11:39 pm by Marty Lederman
Later this morning, the Supreme Court will hear argument in the most significant Religion Clause case of the Term, Fulton v. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 11:03 pm by Josh Blackman
[The DHS Secretary erred because she rescinded the entire DACA policy, rather than just the parts CJ Roberts suggested might be unlawful] Yesterday, I posted my high-level analysis of DHS v. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 9:58 am by Michael Lombardino and Abby Kotun
Employers should consult with their Reed Smith attorneys for further advice regarding the impact of the Court decision on their workplace practices and what steps they should consider taking. __________________________ [1] USCIS, USCIS Statement on Supreme Court’s DACA Decision, June 19, 2020, available at https://www.uscis.gov/news/news-releases/uscis-statement-supreme-courts-daca-decision. [2] Dep’t of Homeland Sec. v. [read post]
15 Nov 2015, 7:48 pm by Marty Lederman
 (When it later moved the INS from the Department of Justice to DHS, Congress transferred this and other authorities from the Attorney General to the DHS Secretary.)When the Texas v. [read post]
29 Apr 2007, 6:36 am
But the more telling stat is DHS's second-place standing. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 11:17 am by John Elwood
Smith; and (3) whether the Supreme Court should reaffirm Smith’s hybrid-rights doctrine, applying strict scrutiny to free exercise claims that implicate other fundamental rights, and resolve the circuit split over the doctrine’s precedential status. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 4:00 am by Anil Kalhan
First, Attorney General Jeff Sessions sent a vague, one-page letter to Acting DHS Secretary Elaine Duke informing her that DHS “should” rescind DACA because, Sessions asserted, the initiative had been “effectuated . . . [read post]