Search for: "SMITH v. GOULD"
Results 1 - 20
of 134
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Sep 2016, 10:55 am
SMITH, IKUTA, N.R. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 11:19 am
Because Judge Smith has a total of four votes (including his own) for his proposed disposition, and then he gets three others (Judges Kozinski, Graber, and Gould) -- a total of seven -- to join that particular portion of his disposition.So you've got to skip around opinions to find the actual holdings.For The Three, Judge Gould writes a concurring opinion (for himself and Judges Kozinski and Graber) explaining their theory. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 11:10 am
The Supreme Court decided a case in 1990, Illinois v. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 1:12 pm
Washington v. [read post]
17 May 2018, 9:58 am
Smith, 333 F.3d 1018 (9th Cir. 2003). [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 11:14 am
Smith, No. 10-10036 (2-3-11) (Gould with Callahan and Korman, Sr. [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 8:39 am
U.S. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 3:08 am
Holley v. [read post]
3 Sep 2008, 4:21 pm
Smith argues that precedent is precedent, and that the jury instruction should have been given.U.S. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 7:58 am
Smith with Sack and Gould)Note: This is an Ariz FPD caseThis case deals with whether the government can bully its own witness into recanting testimony by threatening perjury. [read post]
2 Aug 2007, 7:43 am
US v. [read post]
1 Aug 2008, 10:43 am
Gould argues that Gall is not an abdication of reasonableness review.Mendez v. [read post]
4 May 2019, 5:37 pm
(But not restitution).United States v. [read post]
27 Apr 2007, 8:40 am
The 9th (Gould, Smith and Covello writing) affirm a denial of a habeas challenging California's three-strike provision. [read post]
