Search for: "SMITH v. MILAN" Results 61 - 80 of 186
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Feb 2009, 10:48 am
Judge Milan Smith, joined by Judge Thompson, affirms, holding that this sentence is permissible. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 2:15 pm
(Though that doesn't stop Judge Milan Smith from writing a nine-page concurrence, in which he complains about -- and disagrees with -- the last paragraph of the per curiam opinion. [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 2:11 pm
 Who holds (joined by Chief Judge Thomas) that that portion of the order is impermissible.Judge Milan Smith doesn't agree. [read post]
9 Jan 2015, 11:36 am
 "Defraud" doesn't seem to apply.Now, Judge Milan Smith tells me that the Supreme Court has said that to "defraud" means to do anything that obstructs any function of the government. [read post]
20 May 2014, 11:37 am
 But at 50 pages, unless you're fascinated by mootness issues, the debate between Judges Milan Smith and Wallace is probably, well, moot.To be fair, though, the standing issue arises in the context of Proposition 8. [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 11:02 am
With Judges Callhan, Tallman, and Silverman the dissenters, and the top side including such far-from-leftie judges as Judges Rymer, Bybee, Ikuta, and Milan Smith (plus Kozinski).En banc draws matter sometimes. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 9:14 am by Jon Sands
Furthermore, the relevant inquiry under Thompson v. [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 6:19 pm
Judge Milan Smith concurred, arguing that there wasn't even a liberty interest. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 1:29 pm
  My sense is that Judge Thompson was probably the one assigned to write the initial opinion, because his replacement, Judge Milan Smith, ultimately ends up authoring the decision. [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 1:02 pm
Add to these two Judges McKeown, Gould, Milan Smith, and Ikuta and you're looking at 7 total recusals -- a really high number, and something you don't usually see.So we'll see how this one comes out in the en banc process. [read post]
10 Sep 2007, 1:16 pm
Since the panel then unanimously reversed.Admittedly, with Judges Hall and Milan Smith on the panel, and with the issuance of a warrant, you're not looking too good in trying to defend a suppression motion. [read post]
24 Jan 2008, 10:56 am
So Judge Reinhardt writes an opinion that grants immunity, but Judges Reinhardt, Milan Smith, and Ferguson also write separately to say that they think the circuit precedent on this point is wrong.Thereafter, in rapid order, (1) the July case gets taken en banc, (2) it gets argued last month, and (3) within 45 days, the en banc court unanimously cranks out a per curiam opinion reversing the panel. [read post]