Search for: "SMITH v. NORTH CAROLINA" Results 441 - 460 of 755
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Aug 2013, 9:40 am by Howard Friedman
Plaintiff was no longer in custody of the Utah Department of Corrections but, instead, had been temporarily transferred to federal custody to face federal charges.In Smith v. [read post]
9 Aug 2017, 1:37 pm by Shea Denning
(Jessie Smith wrote about that requirement here.) [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 4:26 pm by Christa Culver
MittsDocket: 10-1000Issue(s): (1) Whether the State of Ohio offends due process by using the same penalty-phase jury instruction affirmed by this Court in Smith v. [read post]
14 Mar 2023, 6:00 am by Joseph L. Hyde
  North Carolina statute divides the crime into degrees – it’s first-degree if the home is occupied – but otherwise retains the common law definition. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 9:38 pm
Todd Smith in his Texas Appellate Law Blog Here's why you and your clients need an ESI policy - Johnette Hassell, founder and CEO of Electronic Evidence Retrieval LLC, in her Computer Forensics & E-Discovery Blog North Carolina Business Court decisions on appeal - Greensboro attorney Mack Sperling of Brooks Pierce LLP in his blog, the North Carolina Business Litigation Report ETUC passes resolution on nanotechnologies and… [read post]
14 Feb 2023, 12:33 pm by Joseph L. Hyde
  (Other jurisdictions have rejected the rule that an indictment’s failure to allege all essential elements of an offense constitutes a jurisdictional defect; North Carolina adheres to the minority view. [read post]
11 May 2016, 2:00 pm
This post examines an opinion from the Court of Appeals of North Carolina:  State v. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 11:35 am by The Blog Team
 was driving a rented car through central North Carolina in February 2012 when he was stopped for speeding. [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 1:50 pm by Brent Wieand
The applicant, North Carolina House Speaker Timothy Moore, is petitioning the Supreme Court to overturn the North Carolina Supreme Court decision that determined the state’s congressional map was unconstitutional. [read post]