Search for: "SMITH v. PHILLIPS" Results 81 - 100 of 354
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jul 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
., SMITH, CURRAN, MONTOUR, AND OGDEN, JJ. 994 TP 22-01050 THE MATTER OF KELLY PHILLIPS, PETITIONER, vNEW YORK STATE DIVISION OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND CITY OF ROCHESTER, RESPONDENTS. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
., SMITH, CURRAN, MONTOUR, AND OGDEN, JJ. 994 TP 22-01050 THE MATTER OF KELLY PHILLIPS, PETITIONER, vNEW YORK STATE DIVISION OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND CITY OF ROCHESTER, RESPONDENTS. [read post]
3 Nov 2009, 2:40 am
Smith  involve similar situations. [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 8:36 am by Elizabeth Clark
Smith was refined first in Church of Lukumi Babalu Aye Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2021, 3:30 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
As the IAS court found, the allegations underlying plaintiff’s malpractice claim were couched in terms of “gross speculations” about future events, without the requisite factual basis to support the allegation (see Phillips-Smith Specialty Retail Group II v Parker Chapin Flattau & Klimpl, 265 AD2d 208, 210 [1st Dept 1999], lv denied 94 NY2d 759 [2000]). [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 6:48 am by Sam Morris, Olswang LLP
The appeal was heard and will be considered by Lady Hale and Lords Phillips, Walker, Brown, Mance, Kerr and Wilson. [read post]
24 Jul 2013, 10:50 am
Marcia Burris and Cheryl Nemeier will co-chair Summit V. [read post]
17 Jul 2011, 9:55 am by Hugh Tomlinson QC, Matrix Law
Phillip Tillet v The Queen (Belize), heard 9 June 2011. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 1:00 am by Daniel West, Olswang LLP.
Partially allowing the appeal, a Court of Appeal panel of Smith LJ, Leveson LJ and Sir Mark Waller once again dismissed the application for summary judgment on procedural grounds but found against the claimants on the points on limitation. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 8:09 am by Michael C. Smith
Smith of Siebman, Reynolds, Burg, Phillips & Smith, LLP to supply an amicus curiae brief on the application of Star Trek, or for that matter, any sci-fi show and its application to Texas law. [read post]