Search for: "SMITH v. SMITH et al" Results 21 - 40 of 1,089
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm by Marty Lederman
As I explained in one of my earlier posts, several or all of the Justices might be inclined to decide the case on some ground that doesn’t require the Court to decide whether Donald Trump is eligible to be President, if such an “off-ramp” solution is legally available. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm by Josh Blackman
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] On January 18, Professor Akhil Reed Amar and Professor Vikram Amar filed an amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
7 Jan 2024, 3:45 am by jonathanturley
– ESTATE OF ASHLI BABBITT) COUNT V Negligent Training (Capitol Police, Capitol Police Board, et al. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 7:09 am by Norman L. Eisen
Supreme Court, Colorado Republican State Central Committee v. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 11:41 am by NARF
Smith (Federal Criminal Jurisdiction; Non-Indian Crimes in Indian Country) Sands, et al. v. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 10:23 am by gA
De aquí la sobreactuación del propio Poder Ejecutivo al destacar la valía de la Corte en el caso “Pérez de Smith”. [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 1:12 am by Kouros Sadeghi-Nejad
On the morning of April 27th , 2023, climate activists Timothy Martin and Joanna Smith of the Declare Emergency organization were indicted by a federal grand jury for their protest at the National Gallery of Art in Washington, D.C. [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm by Jon May
Had he, there would be no need for the constitutional crisis that would arise from the interpretation of the law advocated by Tribe, et al. [read post]
8 Aug 2023, 9:05 pm by renholding
 These activities are conducted on a large scale, with estimates of the total amount of corporate tax avoidance ranging from $212 billion (Tørsløv et al., 2022) to $600 billion (Crivelli et al., 2015). [read post]
8 Aug 2023, 8:20 am by Joseph L. Hyde
LaFave et al., Search & Seizure: A Treatise on the Fourth Amendment § 2.1(e) (6th ed. 2020). [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 9:08 am by Bianca Saad
Supreme Court held that it would violate the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment for Colorado to force a website designer to create a wedding website for a same-sex couple, because it would compel her to create speech in which she did not believe (303 Creative LLC, et al. v. [read post]