Search for: "SMITH v. STATE OF MAINE" Results 61 - 80 of 713
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Sep 2007, 6:47 am
Ed argued (among other things) that SORNA did not apply to his client, who had been convicted of state sex offenses in 1995, released in 2005, and indicted for failing to register under SORNA on Nov. 26, 2006. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 8:25 am by Gabriel Chin
Yesterday the Supreme Court heard argument in United States v. [read post]
24 May 2011, 8:40 am by Cathyrn Hopkins, Olswang LLP
On 9 March 2011, the Supreme Court handed down its judgment in the joint appeal of Sienkiewicz v Grief (UK) Ltd; Knowsley MBC v Willmore [2011] UKSC 10. [read post]
18 Nov 2022, 9:30 pm by ernst
  “This session explores the 1902 landmark decision Roberson v. [read post]
27 Sep 2007, 2:35 pm
" Subsequent to the legislative amendments the US Suprereme Court decided the case of Smith v. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 1:02 pm by Erin Miller
In the “white primary” cases (Smith v. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 2:05 am
La. 1988), aff'd, 864 F.2d 789 (5th Cir. 1988).Maine: Porter v. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 3:15 pm
This time its the "Thompson Twins" Bobby and Bob, Bobby, the surviving recipient of an annuity purchased by the United States from National Home Life Assurance Company* on March 5, 1993 to resolve a 1989 claim brought by her step brother Melvin Ladell Smith, and Bob Thompson, the President of Annuity Transfers, Ltd (collectively "Bobby Bob"). [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 8:20 am by Kim Colby
Discriminatory treatment compared to similar secular conduct: Just three years after Smith, in Church of the Lukumi Babalu Aye v. [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 7:36 am
Lackey was assigned to a case called Jones et al v. [read post]