Search for: "SMITH v. TORR" Results 1 - 20 of 75
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Mar 2024, 6:12 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Seldon v Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP, 116 AD3d 490, 491 [1st Dept 2014], lv dismissed 25 NY3d 985 [2015]). [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Yahoo News – Ken Dilanian and Frank Thorp V (NBC News) | Published: 9/27/2023 U.S. [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 7:07 pm by Anna Bower
He then proceeds to introduce the case that brings us all to the Miami federal courthouse—or, rather, that brought us here 27 hours ago: The United States of America v. [read post]
27 Dec 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
I relied in part on an anecdote involving a visit by Justice Scalia to the University of Texas and and his clear lack of interest in what his friend and former colleague Doug Laycock planned to publish in the Supreme Court Review about his opinion in the “peyote case,” Smith v. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 8:21 am
Professor of Law & Director of Clinical Legal Education, UC Davis School of Law--Robert Cover as Critical Race Theorist   Mark Graber, University System of Maryland Regents Professor, University of Maryland Carey School of Law & Sandford V. [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 4:35 am by Howard Friedman
II (2019).Naji Mansour Nomran & Razali Haron, A Systematic Literature Review on Shari’ah Governance Mechanism and Firm Performance in Islamic Banking, (Islamic Economic Studies, Vol. 27, No. 2, 2020).Virginia La Torre Jeker, 'Handle With Care: How Sharia Law and U.S. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 4:02 am by Edith Roberts
At the Brennan Center for Justice, Ciara Torres-Spelliscy argues that Kelly v. [read post]
10 Feb 2020, 3:09 pm by Orin S. Kerr
In late March, the Supreme Court will hear argument in a Fourth Amendment case, Torres v. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 4:00 pm
This Client Advisory, originally distributed in December 2019, highlights important developments in the law governing employee benefit plans and executive compensation over the past year. [read post]
24 Oct 2017, 4:20 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
[but] if the claim requires the . . . testimony, the defendant enjoys absolute immunity'” (De Lourdes Torres v Jones, 26 NY3d 742, 770 [2016], quoting Coggins v Buonora, 776 F3d 108, 113 [2d Cir 2015], cert denied 575 US ___, 135 S Ct 2335 [2015]; cf. [read post]