Search for: "SMITH v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY"
Results 1 - 20
of 80
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jul 2011, 8:53 am
Importantly, after reading the various takes on United States v. [read post]
15 Nov 2015, 7:48 pm
(When it later moved the INS from the Department of Justice to DHS, Congress transferred this and other authorities from the Attorney General to the DHS Secretary.)When the Texas v. [read post]
6 May 2019, 12:05 pm
(relisted after the March 22, March 29, April 12, April 18 and April 26 conferences) Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
Ultimately, of course, the Supreme Court vacated the Trump administration’s rescission of DACA in 2020 when—by a 5-4 margin, with Chief Justice John Roberts writing for the majority—it decided Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 2:06 pm
California and United States v. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 2:02 pm
Yesterday the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit released its opinion in Latif v. [read post]
28 Oct 2017, 5:01 am
Robert Chesney and Steve Vladeck shared the National Security Law Podcast, featuring their analysis of Smith v. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 9:58 am
In so holding, the Court found the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) did not provide an adequate justification for terminating the DACA program and, thereby, violated the Administrative Procedure Act (APA).[1] But the Court’s decision does not resolve the matter entirely. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 4:31 am
§ 371, which prohibits conspiracies to defraud the United States in the administration of elections. [read post]
19 May 2018, 7:17 am
Sarah Grant reported the latest from the military commission in United States v. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 11:17 am
United States, United States v. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 7:38 am
--The Secretary of State shall make each report submitted under this subsection available to the public on the internet website of the Department of State. [read post]
15 Mar 2014, 5:12 pm
The court in United States v. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 7:35 am
Smith, later consolidated into United States v. [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 6:44 am
The difficult issue in this case is whether Department of Homeland Security had probable cause to lodge an immigration detainer. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 10:30 pm
However, on December 2, 2016, the Sheriff issued a new policy under which inmates subject to either an ICE detainer accompanied by a United States Department of Homeland Security (hereinafter DHS) Warrant for Arrest of Alien, and/or DHS Warrant of Removal/Deportation, are to be held for up to 48 hours after the time they would otherwise have been released, with ICE to be notified immediately. [read post]
24 Sep 2021, 7:27 am
V. [read post]
23 May 2019, 7:12 am
United States, United States v. [read post]
30 May 2019, 8:11 am
(relisted after the March 22, March 29, April 12, April 18, April 26, May 9, May 16 and May 23 conferences) Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 8:57 am
If the Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
