Search for: "SMITH v. WARDEN et al" Results 1 - 20 of 21
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jun 2022, 9:32 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Decided on June 3, 2022 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., SMITH, PERADOTTO, AND WINSLOW, JJ. 516 CA 21-00840 [*1]IN THE MATTER OF DANA HENSLEY, ON BEHALF OF HER MINOR CHILDREN AND ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, ET AL., PETITIONERS-PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, vWILLIAMSVILLE CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL., RESPONDENTS-DEFENDANTS, ANDREW M. [read post]
10 Jun 2022, 9:32 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Decided on June 3, 2022 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., SMITH, PERADOTTO, AND WINSLOW, JJ. 516 CA 21-00840 [*1]IN THE MATTER OF DANA HENSLEY, ON BEHALF OF HER MINOR CHILDREN AND ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, ET AL., PETITIONERS-PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, vWILLIAMSVILLE CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL., RESPONDENTS-DEFENDANTS, ANDREW M. [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 9:25 am
The Rector, Wardens and Vestrymen of Christ Church in Savannah, et al., (Civil Action No. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 7:02 am
Docket: 08-974 Title: Lewis et al. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 10:30 am by John Elwood
  Finally, the Court is awaiting the record in the capital case Juan Smith v. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 12:13 pm by John Elwood
  Certiorari stage documents: Opinion below (9th Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Amicus brief of the Ninth Circuit Public and Community Defenders et al. [read post]
29 May 2008, 5:55 pm
This case concerns a consolidated appeal by Sensations, Inc. et al. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 6:40 am by John Elwood
Amicus brief of Mothers Against Drunk Driving Amicus brief of Louisiana et al. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 7:45 am by John Elwood
Amicus brief of Mothers Against Drunk Driving Amicus brief of Louisiana et al. [read post]
8 May 2007, 9:02 am
No. 06-830, Joblove et al., v. [read post]
21 Dec 2007, 11:59 am
Trouble is… I just have a feeling The Home Office will forget to specify the ‘dress code’ and provide a guest list and we’ll have reports in the The Sun / The Mirror et al that Jacqui Smith was refused entry to her own office. [read post]