Search for: "SOAP v. STATE"
Results 1 - 20
of 252
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm
A fascinating legal soap opera is now underway following a trial just completed in California. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 11:53 am
Still no soap or sanitization products were provided. [read post]
1 Jan 2024, 12:32 pm
In most states, the priestly role has been transformed. [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 8:00 am
VVF Intervest, LLC v. [read post]
6 Oct 2023, 6:07 am
See, e.g., State v. [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 4:03 am
Applicant claimed acquired distinctiveness based on several years of use in the United States and sales representing some 17 million bars of soap, but the Board found the evidence insufficient. [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 7:22 pm
One patient reported consuming raw oysters from an out-of-state establishment. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 1:41 am
Shimooka says nothing about resistance to soap or detergent. [read post]
4 Jun 2023, 5:58 pm
To improve surveillance, the Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists has recommended that all L. monocytogenes isolates be forwarded to state public health laboratories for subtyping through the National Molecular Subtyping Network for Foodborne Disease Surveillance (PulseNet). [read post]
4 May 2023, 11:28 am
Numerous washing machines for dishes and glassware were observed to be in a state of disrepair. [read post]
2 May 2023, 6:40 am
Fund v. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 12:23 pm
Earliest surveys—1921 Coca-Cola v. [read post]
1 Jan 2023, 6:38 pm
In most states, the priestly role has been transformed. [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 12:06 pm
Winter v NRDL (2008) is the leading case for requirements for preliminary injunctive relief. [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 5:03 am
The court’s reasoning disregards the decision in Cincinnati Soap Co. v. [read post]
23 May 2022, 6:21 am
Gries, Michael Kranzlein, Nathan Schneider, Brian Slocum, and Kevin Tobia In Health Freedom Defense Fund, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 8:00 am
The court noted the decision of the Court of Appeal in The Procter and Gamble Company v. [read post]
25 Mar 2022, 6:20 am
This was quickly dismissed by the Judge, stating that the Hearing Officer had properly concluded that there was a low degree of conceptual similarity and that no point of law was to be found there.Turning to the second Ground of appeal, it was submitted that the independency principle had not been applied properly as per Canon v MGM. [read post]
4 Mar 2022, 2:20 pm
" … In defense of the revocation, the State invokes Fordyce v. [read post]
17 Feb 2022, 12:23 pm
Read his amicus brief in Lawrence v. [read post]
