Search for: "SOAP v. STATE"
Results 141 - 160
of 252
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Oct 2010, 5:45 pm
Fang G, Araujo V, Guerrant RL. (1991). [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 11:23 am
Fang G, Araujo V, Guerrant RL. (1991). [read post]
2 May 2009, 3:15 pm
Earlier this week, in the FCC v. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 8:29 am
This decision, Delfi v. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 7:31 am
* Eponia: a State of mind? [read post]
25 May 2017, 9:01 am
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued a significant opinion on the topic of genericness, Elliott v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm
Rothrock v. [read post]
16 Oct 2012, 12:57 am
AND OTHERS v. [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 6:21 am
The GC also stated that Tulliallan could rely on the protection of earlier mark’s reputation for all of the services covered by earlier marks in Class 35. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 3:24 am
”[v] In making this point, Farmer cited the earlier case of DeShaney v. [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 10:02 pm
., Appellants, v. [read post]
25 Mar 2022, 6:20 am
This was quickly dismissed by the Judge, stating that the Hearing Officer had properly concluded that there was a low degree of conceptual similarity and that no point of law was to be found there.Turning to the second Ground of appeal, it was submitted that the independency principle had not been applied properly as per Canon v MGM. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 11:53 am
Still no soap or sanitization products were provided. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 11:07 am
Wash your mouth out with soap! [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 5:00 am
Have no fear, though; previously, in Lake v. [read post]
7 Oct 2018, 9:01 pm
On 05/21/2018 and 05/22/2018, our investigator observed that plastic utensils were kept inside this single compartment sink and were being cleaned with water and soap alone. [read post]
28 May 2020, 4:51 pm
According to the FMCSA, commercial trucking employers who meet those requirements do not need to comply with state meal and rest period laws because the HOS regulations preempt state law. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 3:13 am
For instance, would it be because of Nigeria’s international obligations to recognise well-known brands under certain treaties and agreements such as the TRIPS Agreement as urged in the case of The Procter and Gamble Company v Global Soap and Detergent Industries Ltd and the Registrar of Trade Marks (2013) 2 NWLR (Pt.1336) 409 CA? [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 1:53 pm
It’s actually the opening lines from Orton-Bell v. [read post]
