Search for: "SONG V. HOLDER"
Results 1 - 20
of 436
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jun 2014, 9:56 pm
The case is Lee Oskar Levitin, et al. v. [read post]
2 Jun 2022, 6:09 am
The California Supreme Court has ruled in Pulliam v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 9:56 pm
The case is Lee Oskar Levitin, et al. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 5:47 am
Now, the 10th Circuit reverses, link to decision below:10th Cir: Golan v Holder - First Amendment Challenge To Removal of Copyrighted Works From Public Domain Fails Purchase Copyright Litigation Handbook from West here tweetmeme_source = 'raydowd'; Copyright Litigation Handbook (West 4th Ed. 2009) by Raymond J. [read post]
6 May 2021, 6:40 am
These cases are Lafferty v. [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 8:19 am
If it were an interactive service, the webcasting service would be required to pay individual license fees to the copyright holders of the sound recordings of songs the webcasting service pays for its users. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 3:05 pm
In Lenz v. [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 2:45 pm
” For the brief:https://www.eff.org/document/petition-writ-lenz-v-universal For more on Lenz v. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 8:38 am
There is (according to the complaint in Broadcast Music, Inc., et al. v. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 6:02 pm
Sync licenses are negotiated directly with the copyright holder. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 1:05 pm
The ruling came in Lenz v. [read post]
20 Jan 2007, 11:13 pm
In a lawsuit last year, the companies said XM directly infringes on their exclusive distribution rights by letting consumers record songs onto special receivers marketed as players. [read post]
29 May 2008, 1:36 pm
In TJX Companies, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 7:14 pm
Newton v. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 1:23 pm
In Pearson Education v. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 5:51 pm
In today’s argument in Golan v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 8:47 am
On May 19, 2011, the Second District (Division 1) in Archer v. [read post]
21 Jan 2024, 6:56 am
Here’s their plan: Evidently the plan is to only pay on streams over 1,000 per song accruing during the previous 12 months. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 11:54 am
Holder? [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 11:01 am
The ruling came in Lenz v. [read post]
