Search for: "SONG V. HOLDER" Results 61 - 80 of 433
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Feb 2017, 2:03 pm by Kate Tummarello
Universal, aka the dancing baby case, which centers around an individual whose fair use video was removed from YouTube because it had a Prince song playing in the background. [read post]
8 Feb 2007, 5:41 am
Foster (I strongly recommend that you read the WHOLE article):For the Cynics, an Antidote: The Order in Capitol v. [read post]
16 Sep 2015, 8:45 am by Ron Coleman
Such a request grafts an objective standard onto 512(c)(3)(A)(v)  . . . [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 1:30 am by Jani Ihalainen
This writer wanted to discuss this case sooner, and laments his lateness.The case of Lenz v Universal Music Corporation dealt with Stephanie Lenz, who uploaded a video on YouTube of her young kids dancing to the song Let's Go Crazy by Prince, lasting a lengthy 29 seconds. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 2:59 pm
Thomas, resulting in an absurd verdict of $222,000 for infringement of 24 99-cent song files.Yesterday's decision by the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, in Cartoon Network v. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 5:32 am by Timothy Powers O'Neill
The first-sale doctrine is a limitation on copyright that was recognized by the Supreme Court of the United States in 1908 (see Bobbs-Merrill Co. v. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 5:32 am by Timothy Powers O'Neill
The first-sale doctrine is a limitation on copyright that was recognized by the Supreme Court of the United States in 1908 (see Bobbs-Merrill Co. v. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 3:52 am by Ben
  BASCA v Secretary of State for Innovation and Skills [2015] EWHC 1723 (Admin) [read post]