Search for: "SOUTHWICK v. JONES"
Results 1 - 19
of 19
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Aug 2012, 2:56 pm
Jones, Judge Carolyn D. [read post]
24 Jan 2020, 8:56 am
The other judges, from the left side of the bench around to the right were: Oldham Duncan Willett Higginson Haynes Elrod Stewart Smith Owen Jones Wiener Dennis Southwick Graves Jr. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 4:30 am
Judge Jones wrote the dissent, which was joined by Chief Judge Owen (now Richman), and Judges Weiner, Elrod, and Southwick. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 9:54 am
In dissent were Judges Jones, joined by Owen (now Richman), Wiener, Elrod, and Southwick. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 1:00 pm
According to the denial of rehearing order, In the en banc poll, eight judges voted in favor of rehearing (Chief Judge Richman and Judges Jones, Smith, Elrod, Ho, Duncan, Engelhardt, and Oldham), and nine judges voted against rehearing (Judges Stewart, Southwick, Haynes, Graves, Higginson, Willett, Wilson, Douglas, and Ramirez). [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 9:22 am
The decision consists of three opinions from a three-judge panel: Judge Oldham’s majority opinion, Judge Jones’ concurrence (mostly), and Judge Southwick’s concurrence on the transparency piece and dissent on the rest. [read post]
16 Sep 2022, 2:12 pm
Just released, Netchoice v. [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 4:25 am
” Thirteen judges agreed with the conclusion though twelve (Chief Judge Richman and Judges Jones, Smith, Stewart, Elrod, Southwick, Haynes, Willett, Ho, Duncan, Engelhardt, and Wilson) reversed on lenity grounds while eight members (Judges Jones, Smith, Elrod, Willett, Duncan, Engelhardt, Oldham, and Wilson) reversed on the ground that federal law unambiguously fails to cover non-mechanical bump stocks. [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 4:07 pm
Twelve members (Chief Judge Richman and Judges Jones, Smith, Stewart, Elrod, Southwick, Haynes, Willett, Ho, Duncan, Engelhardt, and Wilson) reverse on lenity grounds. [read post]
10 Sep 2023, 12:57 pm
In Missouri v. [read post]
3 May 2017, 7:04 am
Judge Higginbotham wrote a response to the dissent, and Judge Jones followed by briefly noting that the response should not be confused with a precedential opinion (EEOC v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 11:26 am
NetChoice and NetChoice v. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 1:31 pm
Calcutt v. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 11:18 pm
The NetChoice panel included Judges Jones, Southwick, and Oldham. [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 9:52 am
” Judge Leslie Southwick concurred in part and dissented i [read post]
10 Jul 2022, 4:51 pm
The panel for this argument included Judges King, Elrod, and Southwick. [read post]
18 Aug 2022, 12:26 pm
The majority opinion was written by Judge Jones, and was joined by Chief Judge Richman and Judges Smith, Stewart, Dennis, Southwick, Haynes, Costa, Ho, Duncan, Engelhardt, and Wilson. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 10:44 am
New Massachusetts companies. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 9:44 pm
The proposal to use electricity provoked legal wrangles between the Edison and Westinghouse companies which promoted, respectively, direct and alternating current.Following the first electrocution in 1890, Dr Alfred Southwick, the chair of the commission which recommended the electric chair, was reported as saying that "we live in a higher civilisation from this day"(5) though Thomas Edison reportedly "rebuked the doctors and said it was a mistake to have let them handle the… [read post]
