Search for: "SOWERS v. MAY" Results 1 - 20 of 32
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 May 2015, 3:48 am by Peter Mahler
The First Department did it again last week in a case called Barone v Sowers, 2015 NY Slip Op 04195 [1st Dept May 14, 2015], involving a complaint brought by a 20% member of a single-asset realty holding LLC against the 80% member, alleging a series of derivative claims alongside a claim for dissolution under § 702. [read post]
26 Apr 2007, 10:33 am
State of Indiana , a 5-page opinion, Judge May writes:Joseph Rich appeals his conviction of public intoxication as a Class B misdemeanor. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 8:59 am by smlangston
The announcement was made Monday at ULA headquarters in Centennial, Colo. “I am truly excited about the addition of ULA to NASA’s Commercial Crew Development Program team,” NASA Administrator Charles Bolden said. “Having ULA on board may speed the development of a commercial crew transportation system for the International Space Station, allowing NASA to concentrate its resources on exploring beyond low Earth orbit.” NASA and ULA’s unfunded Space Act… [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 9:15 am
The investigation into these cases began a month after prosecutors learned that the Alco Sensor V device that the San Jose and Palo Alto police departments had been using may have incorrect readings because of a manufacturer's defect that can cause condensation to build up in the tube. [read post]
21 Jun 2015, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
Masters v Palmer, heard 5 May 2015 (HHJ Moloney QC). [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 6:36 am by Walter Olson
The Supreme Court, in a majority opinion by Justice Ruth Ginsburg [Ratslaf v. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 3:20 am by Peter Mahler
The hard lesson learned by the petitioner in Matter of Norvell v Guchi’s Idea LLC, 2016 NY Slip Op 32307(U) [Sup Ct Kings County Nov. 18, 2016], has been taught before, starting most prominently with the First Department’s 2013 decision in Doyle v Icon, LLC and reinforced by that court two years later in Barone v Sowers, holding that minority member claims of oppressive majority conduct including systematic exclusion from the LLC’s… [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 3:28 am by Peter Mahler
The petitioner’s allegations, if true, would not establish that “the management of the entity is unable or unwilling to reasonably permit or promote the stated purpose of the entity to be realized or achieved, or [that] continuing the entity is financially unfeasible” (Matter of 1545 Ocean Ave., LLC, 72 AD3d 121, 131; see Barone v Sowers, 128 AD3d 484; Doyle v Icon, LLC, 103 AD3d 440). [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 3:28 am by Peter Mahler
The petitioner’s allegations, if true, would not establish that “the management of the entity is unable or unwilling to reasonably permit or promote the stated purpose of the entity to be realized or achieved, or [that] continuing the entity is financially unfeasible” (Matter of 1545 Ocean Ave., LLC, 72 AD3d 121, 131; see Barone v Sowers, 128 AD3d 484; Doyle v Icon, LLC, 103 AD3d 440). [read post]