Search for: "SSA (Court Use Only)"
Results 201 - 220
of 290
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jun 2012, 10:38 am
In accord with the SSA’s construction of the statute, the District Court determined that the twins would qualify for benefits only if, as §416(h)(2)(A) specifies, they could inherit from the deceased wage earner under state intestacy law. [read post]
30 May 2012, 4:36 pm
Ct. 1441 (U.S. 2012), the United States Supreme Court restricted the scope of a federal privacy law, ruling that the law – which allows recovery for “actual damages” – only authorizes damages for monetary losses. [read post]
28 May 2012, 3:04 am
The SSA’s interpretation of the relevant provisions, adhered to without deviation for many decades, is at least reasonable; the agency’s reading is therefore entitled to this Court’s deference. [read post]
25 May 2012, 8:00 am
The Supreme Court overturned that ruling, noting that under the principles of comity applied in the State, Maryland courts will withhold recognition of a valid foreign marriage only if that marriage is “repugnant” to State public policy. [read post]
25 May 2012, 8:00 am
The Supreme Court overturned that ruling, noting that under the principles of comity applied in the State, Maryland courts will withhold recognition of a valid foreign marriage only if that marriage is “repugnant” to State public policy. [read post]
23 May 2012, 7:42 am
It is important to note that this refers only to those whose actual conception occurred following the passing, usually using frozen sperm that was saved while the parent was still alive. [read post]
22 May 2012, 1:27 pm
Finally, the Court found that the SSA’s interpretation was at least reasonable, and thus entitled to deference under Chevron. [read post]
22 May 2012, 11:48 am
However, as commendable as it was, SSA continues to use gender in other SSA matching programs, needlessly violating the privacy rights of transgender workers and putting them at risk for discrimination. [read post]
22 May 2012, 6:33 am
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website] ruled unanimously [opinion, PDF] Monday in Astrue v. [read post]
21 May 2012, 8:28 am
Moreover, even if the SSA’s longstanding interpretation is not the only reasonable one, it is at least a permissible construction entitled to deference under Chevron U. [read post]
8 May 2012, 12:30 pm
Improper hypotheticals to the VE are often part of our own Federal Court arguments. but typically we argue that the ALJ used one set of limitations when another more accurately reflects the claimant's problems. [read post]
8 May 2012, 8:53 am
The SSA originally denied the claim and again on reconsideration. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 4:33 pm
" The district court interpreted "actual damages" to apply only to damages for economic loss. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 9:20 am
Supreme Court has issued a decision in Federal Aviation Administration v. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 11:59 am
The government maintains that, to define a child, courts should look at three sections of the Act, while the Capatos contend that only the first two should be considered. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 9:03 am
" As a result, the court affirmed the SSA's decision denying Plaintiff's benefits claim. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 8:20 am
The SSA has acquiesced to this interpretation of “child” for the Ninth Circuit only. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 3:12 pm
In addition to two federal agencies (SSA and CMS), state Medicaid agencies and state Medicaid plans also provide state-specific rules for special needs trusts. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 2:59 am
While a foreign national waits for his Social Security number, the employer can use a letter from SSA stating the foreign national applied for a number, and his immigration documents can prove his authorization to work in the United States. [read post]
11 Feb 2012, 10:07 am
RFC, according to the court, "is assessed using all relevant evidence in the record. [read post]
