Search for: "STANDARD MOTOR PRODUCTS"
Results 41 - 60
of 1,835
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jan 2018, 3:03 pm
Ford Motor Co. [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 6:34 pm
American Honda Motor, No. 445 EDA 2015 (Pa. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 4:30 am
This standard specifies requirements for glazing materials for use in motor vehicles and motor vehicle equipment.S2.Purpose. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 5:55 pm
USDOT Proposes Updated Safety Standard to Prioritize Braking Control, Reduce Risk of High-Speed Unintended Acceleration for Nation's Cars, NHTSA, April 12, 2012 Federal regulators want brake-override systems in all cars, Los Angeles Times, April 13, 2012 More Blog Posts: Toyota Sudden Unintended Acceleration: Engineers Reportedly Discovered an Electronic Software Problem in Test Vehicle, Reports CNN, Product Liability Law Blog, February 29, 2012 Florida Auto… [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 5:16 am
Ford Motor Co. [read post]
10 Mar 2013, 5:34 pm
Ford Motor Co. may click this LINK [read post]
5 Nov 2011, 7:39 am
As an assembler of electronic automotive parts, Musgrove worked for Standard Motor Products from September 28, 1988 until March 22, 2010. [read post]
30 Jul 2017, 1:01 pm
“National appliance standards cover products ranging from refrigerators to commercial air conditioners to electric motors. [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 2:32 pm
Together with his wife, Kim brought this strict products liability suit against defendant Toyota Motor Corporation and related entities (collectively, “Toyota”), claiming that the pickup truck was defective because its standard configuration did not include a particular safety feature, known as vehicle stability control (“VSC”), they claim would have prevented the accident. [read post]
16 Aug 2021, 10:53 am
The NTHSA sates that helmets sold in America must meet Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 11:33 am
Jury Finds Chrysler Liable for $262.5 Million, The New York Times, October 9, 1997 Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards; Door Locks and Door Retention Components and Side Impact Protection, NHTSA More Blog Posts: NHTSA Proposes 'Brake-Throttle Override' Standard to Prevent Unintended Acceleration Crashes, Product Liability Law Blog, April 17, 2012 Seat Belt Syndrome: Child Safety Continues to Take a Back Seat, Product Liability Law Blog,… [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 10:02 am
Under the Act, a product manufacturer or seller may be liable for injuries caused by a defective product if the product was not reasonably fit, suitable, or safe because the product: · Deviated from the design specifications, formula, or performance standards of the manufacturer, or · Failed to contain adequate warnings or instructions, or · Was designed in a defective manner. [read post]
21 Sep 2018, 1:56 pm
Nevertheless, it is wise to stay abreast of the latest recalls in order to avoid possible safety issues concerning consumer products, motor vehicles, foods, or other items. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 1:47 pm
In 1984, the United States government amended the Federal Motor Vehicle Safety standard to require that cars produced after 1989 be equipped with either airbags or an automatic seatbelt. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 5:03 am
Some large patent holders have issued blanket assurances covering substantial portfolios of patents and products, including IBM’s public commitment not to assert approximately 500 patents against open source software products, and Google’s more recent “Open Patent Non-Assertion Pledge“. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 12:39 pm
The defendant demurred to the complaint, contending that the claims were pre-empted by federal law which prohibits a state from establishing any safety standard applicable to a motor vehicle which is not identical to the federal standard [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 4:37 am
Toyota Motor, VW Group, Honda Motor, Kia and suppliers like Bosch and Denso have an impactful patent portfolio in automotive sustainability. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 10:45 am
While General Motors argued that car manufacturers had no duty to design their products to make sure the car had protections for the occupants in the event of a crash, the court ruled otherwise. [read post]
6 Dec 2006, 3:11 pm
An Illinois product liability verdict against Ford Motor and Mazda Motors for defective design of driver's seat was affirmed, but the damage award of $27 million was reduced by an appellate court in Chicago on Nov. 22, 2006. [read post]
26 May 2022, 10:41 am
Ford Motor Co. [read post]
