Search for: "STARR v. PAGE" Results 1 - 20 of 214
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jun 2010, 10:25 am
Interesting case.6-25-2010 Indiana:Although state law allows police to request identification from passengers inside a car that they’ve stopped, two Indianapolis officers shouldn’t have arrested a man for refusing to identify himself when there was no reasonable suspicion he’d done anything wrong.The Indiana Court of Appeals addressed that issue in a six-page opinion today in Adam Starr v. [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 2:41 pm
The briefs in this case can be found at the SCOTUSWiki page here. [read post]
24 Sep 2008, 9:46 pm
  The sentencing judge in United States v. [read post]
12 Jul 2015, 4:10 pm by INFORRM
The most high profile case of the week was the judgment of Nicol J in the case of Starr v Ward ([2015] EWHC 1987 (QB)). [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 3:34 pm by Arthur F. Coon
On May 27, 2015, the California Supreme Court filed a 4-page order modifying portions of the majority and concurring opinions previously filed March 2, 2015, in Berkeley Hillside Preservation v. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 6:02 am
The briefs in this case can be found at the SCOTUSWiki page here. [read post]
26 May 2022, 1:23 pm by Arthur F. Coon
On May 25, 2022, the League of California Cities (“League”) and California State Association of Counties (“CSAC”) filed a 10-page letter with the California Supreme Court requesting it to depublish the First District Court of Appeal’s recent decision in Save the Hill Group v. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 2:52 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  On October 4, 2016, the Fifth Appellate District Court of Appeal issued a two-page Order entitled “Order Modifying Opinion and Denying Rehearing [Includes Change In Judgment]” in the recently decided consolidated appeals in the Citizens for Ceres v. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 11:19 am by Arthur F. Coon
In a 46-page majority opinion written by Justice Chin and joined by four other justices, punctuated by an 18-page concurring opinion (by Justice Liu, joined by Justice Werdegar) which reads like a dissent, the California Supreme Court reversed the First District Court of Appeal’s judgment in Berkeley Hillside Preservation v. [read post]